How muscle synergies fail to solve the muscle redundancy problem during human reaching
Korol, A. S.; Gritsenko, V.
Show abstract
Neural control of movement has to overcome the problem of redundancy in the multidimensional musculoskeletal system. The problem can be solved by reducing the dimensionality of the control space of motor commands, i.e., through muscle synergies or motor primitives. Evidence for this solution exists, multiple studies have obtained muscle synergies using decomposition methods. These synergies vary across different workspaces and are present in both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Here we explore the dimensionality of control space by examining muscle activity patterns across reaching movements in different directions starting from different postures performed bilaterally by healthy individuals. We further explore the effect of biomechanical constraints on the dimensionality of control space. We are building on top of prior work showing that muscle activity profiles can be explained by applied moments about the limb joints that reflect the biomechanical constraints. These muscle torques derived from motion capture represent the combined actions of muscle contractions that are under the control of the nervous system. Here we test the generalizability of the relationship between muscle torques and muscle activity profiles across different starting positions and between limbs. We also test a hypothesis that the dimensionality of control space is shaped by biomechanical constraints. We used principal component analysis to evaluate the contribution of individual muscles to producing muscle torques across different workspaces and in both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Results generalize and support the hypothesis. We show that the muscle torques that support the limb against gravity are produced by more consistent combinations of muscle co-contraction than those that produce propulsion. This effect was the strongest in the non-dominant arm moving in the lateral workspace on one side of the body.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Orientation control strategies and adaptation to a visuomotor perturbation in rotational hand movements 96%
- Role and modulation of various spinal pathways for human upper limb control in different gravity conditions 95%
- Similar sensorimotor transformations control balance during standing and walking 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.