Transcriptomic landscape of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived osteogenic differentiation identifies a regulatory role of KLF16
Ru, Y.; Ma, M.; Zhou, X.; Kriti, D.; Cohen, N.; Souza, S.; Schaniel, C.; Motch Perrine, S. M.; Kuo, S.; Pinto, D.; Housman, G.; Wu, M.; Holmes, G.; Schadt, E.; van Bakel, H.; Zhang, B.; Jabs, E. W.
Show abstract
Osteogenic differentiation is essential for bone development, metabolism, and repair; however, the underlying regulatory relationships among genes remain poorly understood. To elucidate the transcriptomic changes and identify novel regulatory genes involved in osteogenic differentiation, we differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from 20 human iPSC lines into preosteoblasts (preOBs) and osteoblasts (OBs). We then performed transcriptome profiling of MSCs, preOBs and OBs. The iPSC-derived MSCs and OBs showed similar transcriptome profiles to those of primary human MSCs and OBs, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis revealed global changes in the transcriptomes from MSCs to preOBs, and then to OBs, including the differential expression of 840 genes encoding transcription factors (TFs). TF regulatory network analysis uncovered a network comprising 451 TFs, organized into five interactive modules. Multiscale embedded gene co-expression network analysis (MEGENA) identified gene co-expression modules and key network regulators (KNRs). From these analyses, KLF16 emerged as an important TF in osteogenic differentiation. We demonstrate that overexpression of Klf16 in vitro inhibited osteogenic differentiation and mineralization, while Klf16+/- mice exhibited increased bone mineral density, trabecular number, and cortical bone area. Our study underscores the complexity of osteogenic differentiation and identifies novel regulatory genes such as KLF16, which plays an inhibitory role in osteogenic differentiation both in vitro and in vivo.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-nucleus transcriptional and chromatin accessibility analyses of maturing mouse Achilles tendon uncover the molecular landscape of tendon stem/progenitor cells 95%
- Transcriptional regulation of cyclophilin D by BMP/SMAD signaling and its role in osteogenic differentiation 95%
- Peroxiredoxin 5 regulates osteogenic differentiation via interaction with hnRNPK during bone regeneration 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Arp2/3 complex activity is necessary for mouse ESC differentiation, times formative pluripotency, and enables lineage specification 94%
- Transient DUX4 expression induces blastomere-like expression program that is marked by SLC34A2 94%
- Single cell transcriptomics reveals correct developmental dynamics and high-quality midbrain cell types by improved hESC differentiation. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic regulations follow cell cycle progression during differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. 94%
- Basigin Links Altered Skeletal Stem Cell Lineage Dynamics with Glucocorticoid-induced Bone Loss and Impaired Angiogenesis 93%
- Mechanisms of the FTO locus association with obesity: Irx3 controls a sumoylation-dependent switch between adipogenesis and osteogenesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fibroblast diversification is an embryonic process dependent on muscle contraction 93%
- Global transcriptomic profiling of the bone marrow stromal microenvironment during postnatal development, aging and inflammation 93%
- Molecular competition in G1 controls when cells simultaneously commit to terminally differentiate and exit the cell-cycle 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- FBW7 couples structural integrity with functional output of primary cilia 95%
- MME+ fibro-adipogenic progenitors are the dominant adipogenic population during fatty infiltration in human skeletal muscle 93%
- GFI1 tethers the NuRD complex to open and transcriptionally active chromatin in myeloid progenitors 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.