Identification of key genes and biological pathways in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using bioinformatics and next generation sequencing data analysis
Vastrad, B. M.; Vastrad, C. M.
Show abstract
Identification of accurate biomarkers is still particularly urgent for improving the poor survival of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. In this investigation, we aimed to identity the potential biomarkers in COPD via bioinformatics and next generation sequencing (NGS) data analysis. In this investigation, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in COPD were identified using NGS dataset (GSE239897) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Subsequently, gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis was conducted to evaluate the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in progression of COPD. Protein-protein interaction (PPI), modules, miRNA-hub gene regulatory network and TF-hub gene regulatory network analysis were performed to determine the hub genes, miRNAs and TFs. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic value of hub genes. A total of 956 overlapping DEGs (478 up regulated and 478 down regulated genes) were identified in the NGS dataset. DEGs were mainly associated with GO functional terms and pathways in cellular response to stimulus. response to stimulus, immune system and neutrophil degranulation. There were 10 hub genes (MYC, LMNA, VCAM1, MAPK6, DDX3X, SHMT2, PHGDH, S100A9, FKBP5 and RPS6KA2) identified by PPI, modules, miRNA-hub gene regulatory network and TF-hub gene regulatory network analysis. In conclusion, the DEGs, relative GO terms, pathways and hub genes identified in the present investigation might aid in understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying COPD progression and provide potential molecular targets and biomarkers for COPD.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bioinformatic characterization of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, the entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection induces mixed M1/M2 phenotype in circulating monocytes and alterations in both dendritic cell and monocyte subsets 94%
- Novel prognostic determinants of COVID-19-related mortality: a pilot study on severely-ill patients in Russia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Comorbidities on SARS-CoV-2 Viral Entry-Related Genes 94%
- Comprehensive profiling of genomic and transcriptomic differences between risk groups of lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma 93%
- Intersections between copper, β-arrestin-1, calcium, FBXW7, CD17, insulin resistance and atherogenicity mediate depression and anxiety due to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nomothetic network approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural variability, expression profile and pharmacogenetics properties of TMPRSS2 gene as a potential target for COVID-19 therapy 94%
- Epigenetic Evolution of ACE2 and IL-6 Genes as Non-Canonical Interferon-Stimulated Genes Correlate to COVID-19 Susceptibility in Vertebrates 93%
- Molecular pathways associated with Kallikrein 6 overexpression in colorectal cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide induces myocardial differentiation of murine pluripotent stem cells 93%
- Decreased levels of soluble Developmental endothelial locus-1 are associated with thrombotic microangiopathy in pregnancy 93%
- Hematopoietic growth factors Regulate Entry of Monocytes into the Adult Brain via Chemokine Receptor CCR5 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of candidate biomarkers and therapeutic agents for heart failure by bioinformatics analysis 95%
- Catalpol inhibits HHcy-induced EndMT in endothelial cells by modulating ROS/NF-κB signaling 93%
- C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Long-Term Mortality in Pericarditis: A Real-World Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.