Back

Key unprotected areas for carnivore conservation in Mexico

Gonzalez, G. I.; Harris, N. C.

2024-02-12 ecology
10.1101/2024.02.10.579669 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Area-based conservation remains a pivotal component of global wildlife protection efforts. Mexico hosts a diverse array of area-based approaches, encompassing protected areas (PAs) and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) such as voluntary conservation areas (VCAs) and wildlife management units (UMAs). Indigenous Territories (ITs) also provide heightened conservation potential through traditional ecological knowledge systems. These conservation spaces exhibit significant variations in community involvement, national coverage, and governance. Here, we evaluate the conservation potential of these land management types for 29 terrestrial carnivores, focusing on spatial co-occurrence. We determine areas in Mexico lacking area-based protection and calculate carnivore richness per land management type. Analyzing overlap between land management types and carnivore ranges, we employ heat maps to visualize overlap occurrence and key unprotected areas. We found that across all carnivore ranges, 87% of the area remains unprotected under designated protection areas (PAs & VCAs), decreasing to 65.2% after including non-designated types (ITs and UMAs). We identified several key gaps in the protection estate for Mexican carnivores, most notably on the eastern Mexican coast in the state of Veracruz. Our findings corroborate the importance of including Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in conservation efforts, emphasizing their contributions to the stewardship of Mexican ecosystems. As the global protected area estate continues to expand under the post-2020 global biodiversity targets, and the importance of a well-designed and diverse portfolio of practices for conservation is recognized, the need for collective action, increased collaboration and inclusivity, and effective communication amongst stakeholders becomes necessary for carnivore conservation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
2
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
4
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
6
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
13
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%