Iguanas from above: Citizen scientists provide reliable counts of endangered Galapagos marine iguanas from drone imagery
Varela-Jaramillo, A.; Winkelmann, C.; Rivas-Torres, G.; Guayasamin, J. M.; Steinfartz, S.; MacLeod, A.
Show abstract
Population surveys are vital for wildlife management, yet traditional methods often demand excessive time and resources, leading to data gaps for many species. Modern technologies such as drones can facilitate field surveys but may also increase data analysis challenges. Citizen Science (CS) can address this issue by engaging non-specialists for data collection and analysis. We evaluated CS for population monitoring using the endangered Galapagos marine iguana as a case study, assessing online volunteers ability to detect and count animals in aerial images. Comparing against a Gold Standard dataset of expert counts in 4345 images, we explored optimal aggregation methods from CS inputs, considering image quality and filtering data from infrequent and anonymous participants. During three phases of our project -- hosted on the Zooniverse platform -- over 13,000 volunteers made 1,375,201 classifications from 57,838 aerial images; each being independently classified 20 (phases 1 & 2) or 30 (phase 3) times. Volunteers achieved 68% to 94% accuracy in detecting iguanas, with more false negatives than false positives. Image quality strongly influenced accuracy; by excluding data from suboptimal pilot-phase images, volunteers counted with 90% to 92% of accuracy. For detecting presence or absence of iguanas, the commonly used majority vote aggregation approach (where the answer selected is that given by the majority of individual inputs) produced less accurate results than when a minimum threshold of five (from the 20/30 independent classifications) was used. For counting iguanas, HDBSCAN clustering yielded the best results. Excluding inputs from anonymous and inexperienced volunteers decreased accuracy. We conclude that online volunteers can accurately identify and count marine iguanas from drone images, though a tendency to underestimate warrants further consideration. CS-based data analysis is faster than manual counting but still resource-intensive, underscoring the need to develop a Machine Learning approach.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy and precision of citizen scientist animal counts from drone imagery 96%
- A low-cost, long-term underwater camera trap network coupled with deep residual learning image analysis 93%
- A framework for the development of a global standardised marine taxon reference image database (SMarTaR-ID) to support image-based analyses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A pipeline for assessing the quality of iNaturalist data and images and the importance of metadata and image quality control when using crowd-sourced databases. 95%
- Tracking butterfly flight in the field from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): a methodological proof of principle. 93%
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- DiversityScanner: Robotic discovery of small invertebrates with machine learning methods 91%
- Next-generation snow leopard population assessment tool: multiplex-PCR SNP panel for individual identification from feces 90%
- A snakemake toolkit for the batch assembly, annotation, and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial genomes and ribosomal genes from genome skims of museum collections. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transects, quadrats, or points? What is the best combination to get a precise estimation of a coral community? 92%
- Multi-Object Tracking in Heterogeneous environments (MOTHe) for animal video recordings 92%
- Advancements in monitoring: a comparison of traditional and application-based tools for measuring outdoor recreation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using machine learning to count Antarctic shag (Leucocarbo bransfieldensis) nests on images captured by Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems 96%
- Exploiting facial side similarities to improve AI-driven sea turtle photo-identification systems 95%
- Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards (Panthera uncia) after Automated Detection 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.