Global niche partitioning of purine and pyrimidine cross-feeding among ocean microbes
Braakman, R.; Satinsky, B.; O'Keefe, T. J.; Longnecker, K.; Becker, J. W.; Dooley, K.; Hogle, S. L.; Arellano, A.; Kido Soule, M. C.; Kujawinski, E. B.; Chisholm, S. W.
Show abstract
Cross-feeding involves microbes consuming the exudates of other surrounding microbes, mediating elemental cycling. Characterizing the diversity of cross-feeding pathways in ocean microbes illuminates evolutionary forces driving self-organization of ocean ecosystems. Here, we uncover a purine and pyrimidine cross-feeding network in globally abundant groups. The cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus exudes both compound classes, which metabolic reconstructions suggest follows synchronous daily genome replication. Co-occurring heterotrophs differentiate into purine- and pyrimidine-using generalists, or specialists that use compounds for different purposes. The most abundant heterotroph, SAR11, is a specialist that uses purines as sources of energy, carbon and/or nitrogen, with subgroups differentiating along ocean-scale gradients in the supply of energy and nitrogen, in turn producing putative cryptic nitrogen cycles that link many microbes. Finally, in a SAR11 subgroup that dominates where Prochlorococcus is abundant, adenine additions to cultures inhibit DNA synthesis, poising cells for replication. We argue this subgroup uses inferred daily adenine pulses from Prochlorococcus to synchronize to the daily photosynthate supply from surrounding phytoplankton.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential global distribution of marine picocyanobacteria gene clusters reveals distinct niche-related adaptive strategies 96%
- Toward quantifying the adaptive role of bacterial pangenomes during environmental perturbations 95%
- Halophilic microbial community compositional shift after a rare rainfall in the Atacama Desert 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.