Brain signal complexity and aperiodicity predict human corticospinal excitability
Frohlich, J.; Ruch, S.; Trunk, B. H.; Keute, M.; Mediano, P. A. M.; Gharabaghi, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) holds promise for brain modulation with relevant scientific and therapeutic applications, but it is limited by response variability. Targeting state-dependent EEG features such as phase and power shows potential, but uncertainty remains about the suitable brain states. ObjectiveThis study evaluated broadband EEG measures (BEMs), including the aperiodic exponent (AE) and entropy measures (CTW, LZ), as alternatives to band-limited features, such as power and phase, for predicting corticospinal excitability (CSE). MethodsTMS was delivered with randomly applied single pulses targeting the left primary motor cortex in 34 healthy participants while simultaneously recording EEG and EMG signals. Broadband and band-limited EEG features were evaluated for their ability to predict CSE using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right extensor digitorum communis muscle as the outcome measure. ResultsBEMs (AE, CTW) significantly predicted CSE, comparable to beta-band power and phase, the most predictive and spatially specific band-limited markers of motor cortex CSE. Unlike these localized CSE markers at the site of stimulation, BEMs captured more global brain states and greater within-subject variability, indicating sensitivity to dynamic state changes. Notably, CTW was associated with high CSE, while AE was linked to low CSE. ConclusionThis study reveals BEMs as robust predictors of CSE that circumvent challenges of band-limited EEG features, such as narrowband filtering and phase estimation. They may reflect more general markers of brain excitability. With their slower timescale and broader sensitivity, BEMs are promising biomarkers for state-dependent TMS applications, particularly in therapeutic contexts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 96%
- Predictive modeling of TMS-evoked responses: Unraveling instantaneous excitability states 95%
- A Practical Preprocessing Pipeline for Concurrent TMS-iEEG: Critical Steps and Methodological Considerations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex 95%
- Assessing cerebellar-cortical connectivity using concurrent TMS-EEG: A Feasibility Study 95%
- Functional segregation of cortical hand and speech areas by frequency detuning of an intrinsic motor rhythm. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized whole-brain activity patterns predict human corticospinal tract activation in real-time 96%
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 95%
- Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.