Back

Understanding staff needs for Improving End-of-life Care in Critical Care Units

Tavabie, S.; Pearson, S.; Balabanovic, J.; Batho, A.; Juj, M.; Katsande, P.; Bennetts, J.; Collis, E.; Bonnici, T.

2024-02-13 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.02.09.24302454 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesCritical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. MethodThree multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. ResultsN=34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative) The five themes were structured as priority statements: "We need to recognise" included the subthemes of being "sick enough to die" and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; "We need to understand" with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; "We need to connect" with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; "We need to collaborate" with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; "We need support" with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. ConclusionWe present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.