Back

Binding Position Dependent Modulation of Smoothened Activity by Cyclopamine

Kim, K.; Bansal, P. D.; Shukla, D.

2024-02-12 biophysics
10.1101/2024.02.08.579369 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyclopamine is a natural alkaloid that is known to act as an agonist when it binds to the Cysteine Rich Domain (CRD) of the Smoothened receptor and as an antagonist when it binds to the Transmembrane Domain (TMD). To study the effect of cyclopamine binding to each binding site experimentally, mutations in the other site are required. Hence, simulations are critical for understanding the WT activity due to binding at different sites. Additionally, there is a possibility that cyclopamine could bind to both sites simultaneously especially at high concentration, the implications of which remain unknown. We performed three independent sets of simulations to observe the receptor activation with cyclopamine bound to each site independently (CRD, TMD) and bound to both sites simultaneously. Using multi-milliseconds long aggregate MD simulations combined with Markov state models and machine learning, we explored the dynamic behavior of cyclopamines interactions with different domains of WT SMO. A higher population of the active state at equilibrium, a lower activation free energy barrier of[~] 2 kcal/mol, and expansion of the hydrophobic tunnel to facilitate cholesterol transport agrees with the cyclopamines agonistic behavior when bound to the CRD of SMO. A higher population of the inactive state at equilibrium, a higher free energy barrier of[~] 4 kcal/mol and restricted the hydrophobic tunnel to impede cholesterol transport showed cyclopamines antagonistic behavior when bound to TMD. With cyclopamine bound to both sites, there was a slightly larger inactive population at equilibrium and an increased free energy barrier ([~] 3.5 kcal/mol). The tunnel was slightly larger than when solely bound to TMD, and showed a balance between agonism and antagonism with respect to residue movements exhibiting an overall weak antagonistic effect.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.