Back

Changing rounds into squares or combining stripes: Diversity and formation of checkerboard patterns in Eukaryotes

Galipot, P.; Zalko, J.

2024-02-07 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.02.07.579346 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Important in many human artistic cultures, checkerboard patterns are rare in nature like many motifs based on squared geometry. Nevertheless, they are expected to be very detectable by the visual systems due to their periodic geometry and contrasted two-tone coloring, therefore potential specific biological functions are suspected. Here, thanks to a biological survey, we draw the first diversity landscape of eukaryotic species bearing checkerboard patterns, confirming their rarity but also their presence in extremely diverse clades. Then, we selected two genera, Sarcophaga flies and Fritillaria flowers, to perform in-depth pattern analyses allowing us to make strong hypotheses on the mechanisms producing these very peculiar patterns, as no morphogenetic process was known to generate checkerboards. Although they share a similar geometry, these two genera appear to produce checkerboards through very different ways, showing a convergence of shape but not of processes. Whereas the Fritillaria analysis points to a geometric constraining of a Turing-like pattern by the parallel network of veins, that of Sarcophaga suggest the reuse of developmental boundaries and right-left symmetry, together by the combination of vertical and horizontal stripes. Furthermore, we present the first description to our knowledge of the striking color-changing nature of Sarcophaga checkerboards, whose light and dark squares can exchange their color depending on the angles of lighting and observation thanks to the planar polarity of the cuticular hairs, the setae. Together, this shows the extent of the processes selected during evolution to generate complex forms and colors, and confirms the importance of studying morphogenesis with in-depth pattern analyses and through species diversity. Finally, by enabling strong hypotheses to be made about the morphogenesis of these patterns, it paves the way for the molecular identification of the morphogenetic processes at work.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.2%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
9
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
10
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.8%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
22
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%