Back

Insights into ontogenetic scaling and morphological variation in sharks from near-term brown smooth-hound (Mustelus henlei) embryos

Gayford, J. H.; Sternes, P. C.; Seamone, S. G.; Godfrey, H.; Whitehead, D. A.

2024-02-06 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.02.05.578906 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) exhibit a wide range of body forms adapted to various ecological niches. Body form differs not only between species, but between life stages of individual species as a result of ontogenetic allometry. In sharks, it has been proposed that these ontogenetic shifts in body form result from shifts in trophic and/or spatial ecology (the allometric niche shift hypothesis). Alternatively, it has been suggested that ontogenetic allometry may result from intrinsic morphological constraints associated with increasing body size - e.g. to counteract shifts in form-function relationships that occur as a function of size and could compromise locomotory performance. One major limitation affecting our understanding of ontogenetic scaling in sharks is that existing studies focus on postpartum ontogeny - ignoring the period of growth that occurs prior to birth/hatching. In this study, we report ontogenetic growth trajectories from 39 near-term brown smooth hound (Mustelus henlei) embryos taken from manually collected measurements. We found that unlike most other species and later ontogenetic stages of M. henlei, these embryos predominantly grow isometrically, and appear to display relatively high levels of morphological disparity. These results provide rudimentary support for the allometric niche shift hypothesis (as in the absence of ontogenetic niche shifts isometry dominates body-form scaling) and provide important insight into early shark ontogeny and morphological/developmental evolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.5%
2
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
16
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%