Clinical evaluation of the Roche distributed SD Biosensor SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Rapid Antigen Test amongst mild symptomatic people during the 2022/2023 winter season.
Igloi, Z.; Velzing, J.; Koopmans, M.; Molenkamp, R.
Show abstract
Both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 are seasonal respiratory illnesses with similar symptoms, however distinguishing one from the other can have benefits for the patient and have different implications in various settings. In this study we have evaluated the clinical performance of the Roche distributed SD Biosensor SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Rapid Antigen Test during the 2022/2023 winter season, in a non-hospitalized, mild symptomatic population, comparing results with reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Participants also filled in a short questionnaire about their symptom onset, symptoms, vaccination status for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2. We could include 290 people with complete records with female majority (72%, 209/290). Age ranged from 18 years old (minimum age for inclusion) to 71 years (mean age was 40.4 years). From the 290 inclusions 93 tested positive with SARS-CoV-2 PCR, 12 by influenza A and 6 by influenza B PCR. For SARS-CoV-2 overall sensitivity was 72.0% (confidence interval, CI 61.8-80.9%) and specificity 99.5% (CI 97.2-99.9%). SARS-CoV-2 RDT performed best up to and including PCR ct value of 25 (sensitivity 96% CI 85.8-99.5%), but could also detect samples less or equal to PCR ct 33, however with lower sensitivity (sensitivity 80.0% CI 69.6-88.1%). For influenza limited amount of samples were available; the RDT detected influenza A with 58.3% sensitivity (CI 27.7-84.8) and 100% specificity (CI 98.6-100.0%). In case of influenza B the inclusions were too low to calculate sensitivity reliably (2/6, 33.3% CI 4.3-77.7%); specificity was 98.2% (5/274, CI 95.8-99.4%). No cross reaction between SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B was experienced. As was shown before, SARS-CoV-2 could be determined with high sensitivity in recent onset and lower than ct 25 samples. In spite of performing the study throughout the influenza season, we had sub optimal inclusions for determining RDT clinical performance; further studies are needed.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance Evaluation Of A SARS-COV-2 Rapid Antigentest: Test Performance In The Community In The Netherlands 96%
- Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Clinical impact of the rapid molecular detection of RSV and influenza A and B virus in the emergency room 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of three rapid lateral flow antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: potential to help reduce community spread? 94%
- Evaluation of Commercial Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Assays in seropositive subjects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel 97%
- High Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Ethiopian healthcare workers 93%
- Divergences on expected pneumonia cases during the COVID-19 epidemic in Catalonia: A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 6 million people 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of an automated, rapid mariPOC ® antigen test in screening of symptomatics and asymptomatics for SARS-CoV-2 infections 95%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 95%
- Validation and Performance Comparison of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of six commercial SARS-CoV-2 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assays for clinical testing and serosurveillance 95%
- Acceptability, usability and performance of lateral flow immunoassay tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: REACT-2 study of self-testing in non-healthcare key workers 93%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the craft and manual worker population of Qatar 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.