Comparison of six methods for stabilizing metapopulation dynamics and for their robustness against census noise
Singh, A.; Tung, S.
Show abstract
Natural populations face growing extinction risks due to mismatches between traits and ecological conditions, exacerbated by habitat degradation and climate change. While several population control methods have been proposed to protect vulnerable populations, their effectiveness in spatially structured populations (metapopulations) and resilience to census inaccuracies remain unexplored. This study uses simulations to evaluate six control methods, originally designed to stabilize isolated populations, in metapopulations. We compared these methods across twelve ecological conditions based on three stability metrices and implementation costs. Without interventions, the twelve metapopulation scenarios exhibited distinct dynamics and extinction susceptibilities. Comparing the control methods against these baseline dynamics, we found that Adaptive Limiter Control consistently reduced extinction probabilities, while Lower Limiter Control effectively minimized population fluctuations in most settings, followed by Adaptive and Both Limiter Controls. These performance rankings remained robust despite simulated census errors. Our findings provide actionable insights for conservation policies aimed at stabilizing vulnerable metapopulations and offer a general framework for studying metapopulation dynamics using external interventions.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Should regional species loss be faster, or slower, than local loss? It depends on density-dependent rate of death 93%
- Evolutionary rescue is determined by differential selection on demographic rates and density dependence. 93%
- Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close-kin mark-recapture assessments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of time-series length and resolution on abundance- and trait-based early warning signals of population declines 95%
- Genetically diverse populations spread faster in benign but not in challenging environments 91%
- Top predator introduction changes the effects of spatial isolation on freshwater community structure 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population demographic history and evolutionary rescue: influence of a bottleneck event 93%
- Adaptive, maladaptive, neutral, or absent plasticity: Hidden caveats of reaction norms 92%
- Mathematical modeling of genetic pest management through female-specific lethality: Is one locus better than two? 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Density-dependent selection at high food levels leads to the evolution of persistence but not constancy in Drosophila melanogaster populations 93%
- Unravelling processes between phenotypic plasticity and population dynamics in migratory birds 92%
- Non-senescent species are not immortal: stress and decline in two planaria species 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.