Defining the conformational states that enable transglutaminase 2 to promote cancer cell survival versus cell death
Aplin, C.; Zielinski, K. A.; Pabit, S.; Ogunribido, D.; Katt, W. P.; Pollack, L.; Cerione, R. A.; Milano, S. K.
Show abstract
Transglutaminase 2 (TG2) is a GTP-binding/protein-crosslinking enzyme that has been investigated as a therapeutic target for Celiac disease, neurological disorders, and aggressive cancers. TG2 has been suggested to adopt two conformational states that regulate its functions: a GTP-bound, closed conformation, and a calcium-bound, crosslinking-active open conformation. TG2 mutants that constitutively adopt an open conformation are cytotoxic to cancer cells. Thus, small molecules that maintain the open conformation of TG2 could offer a new therapeutic strategy. Here, we investigate TG2, using static and time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and single-particle cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), to determine the conformational states responsible for conferring its biological effects. We also describe a newly developed TG2 inhibitor, LM11, that potently kills glioblastoma cells and use SAXS to investigate how LM11 affects the conformational states of TG2. Using SAXS and cryo-EM, we show that guanine nucleotide-bound TG2 adopts a monomeric closed conformation while calcium-bound TG2 assumes an open conformational state that can form higher order oligomers. SAXS analysis also suggests how a TG2 mutant that constitutively adopts the open state binds nucleotides through an alternative mechanism to wildtype TG2. Furthermore, we use time-resolved SAXS to show that LM11 increases the ability of calcium to drive TG2 to an open conformation, which is not reversible by guanine nucleotides and is cytotoxic to cancer cells. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that the conformational dynamics of TG2 are more complex than previously suggested and highlight how conformational stabilization of TG2 by LM11 maintains TG2 in a cytotoxic conformational state. Significance StatementThe multi-functional protein transglutaminase 2 (TG2) undergoes large conformational changes in response to nucleotide and calcium binding, resulting in diverse cellular effects that can differentially promote either cancer cell survival or cell death. Previous biochemical and structural characterizations have revealed that TG2 primarily adopts two conformational states, a closed nucleotide-bound conformation, and an open calcium-bound conformation. In this study, we use advanced structural methods to describe the conformational changes associated with TG2 activation and inhibition and define the mechanism by which small molecule inhibitors maintain TG2 in a structural state that kill cancer cells.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Shape-Shifting Conotoxins Reveal Divergent Pore-Targeting Mechanisms in Nicotinic Receptors 95%
- Inhibition of Talin-induced Integrin Activation by a Double-hit Stapled Peptide 95%
- Expanding the Huntingtons disease research toolbox; validated huntingtin subdomain constructs for biochemical and structural investigation of the huntingtin protein 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural insights into hormone recognition by the human glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor 96%
- A novel bivalent interaction mode underlies a non-catalytic mechanism for Pin1-mediated Protein Kinase C regulation 95%
- Conformational dynamics and allosteric modulation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Talin mechanosensitivity is modulated by a direct interaction with cyclin-dependent kinase-1 96%
- Development of an inhibitory TTC7B selective nanobody that blocks EFR3 recruitment of PI4KA 96%
- Molecular architecture and domain arrangement of the placental malaria protein VAR2CSA suggests a model for receptor binding 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.