Back

Personalized allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 strategies for myofibrillar myopathy 6

Shin, J. W.; Kim, K.-H.; Lee, Y.; Choi, D. E.; LEE, J.-M.

2024-02-04 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.02.03.24302252 medRxiv
Show abstract

Myofibrillar myopathy 6 (MFM6) is a rare childhood-onset myopathy characterized by myofibrillar disintegration, muscle weakness, and cardiomyopathy. The genetic cause of MFM6 is p.Pro209Leu mutation (rs121918312-T) in the BAG3 gene, which generates the disease outcomes in a dominant fashion. Since the consequences of the BAG3 mutation are strong and rapidly progressing, most MFM6 patients are due to de novo mutation. There are no effective treatments for MFM6 despite its well-known genetic cause. Given p.Pro209Leu mutation is dominant, regenerative medicine approaches employing orthologous stem cells in which mutant BAG3 is inactivated offer a promising avenue. Here, we developed personalized allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 strategies capitalizing on PAM-altering SNP and PAM-proximal SNP. In order to identify the disease chromosome carrying the de novo mutation in our two affected individuals, haplotype phasing through cloning-sequencing was performed. Based on the sequence differences between mutant and normal BAG3, we developed personalized allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 strategies to selectively inactivate the mutant allele 1) by preventing the transcription of the mutant BAG3 and 2) by inducing nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) of mutant BAG3 mRNA. Subsequent experimental validation in patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines showed complete allele specificities of our CRISPR-Cas9 strategies and molecular consequences attributable to inactivated mutant BAG3. In addition, mutant allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 targeting did not alter the characteristics of iPSC or the capacity to differentiate into cardiomyocytes. Together, our data demonstrate the feasibility and potential of personalized allele-specific CRISPR-Cas9 approaches to selectively inactivate the mutant BAG3 to generate cell resources for regenerative medicine approaches for MFM6.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
6
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
9
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
14
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
16
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
20
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
21
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Experimental & Molecular Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%