Back

The 4T1 breast carcinoma model possesses hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal traits linked to a highly metastatic phenotype

Herndon, M. E.; Gibson-Corley, K.; Wallrath, L. L.; Henry, M.; Stipp, C. S.

2024-02-07 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.02.02.578710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMTs) have emerged as a mechanism for carcinomas to gain metastatic capabilities. As classically defined, EMTs entail downregulation of E-cadherin, viewed as a master enforcer of an epithelial phenotype, and upregulation of mesenchymal markers such as N-cadherin and vimentin. Contrary to this, E-cadherin appears to be retained in many invasive carcinomas and promote collective cell invasion. Therefore, major questions remain concerning the role of E-cadherin in metastasis. To investigate how E-cadherin regulates metastasis, we selected murine 4T1 breast carcinoma cells, a widely utilized model of stage IV metastatic breast cancer that retains E-cadherin expression. Using RNA interference and constitutive expression, we demonstrate that the expression level of E-cadherin does not determine 4T1 metastatic capacity in mice. Despite high levels of expression, E-cadherin is unable to confer an epithelial phenotype with stable organized cell-cell junctions. Moreover, orthotopic 4T1 tumors in mice display co-expression of E-cadherin and vimentin and contain subregions of EMT-like loss of E-cadherin. In addition, we find that 4T1 cells co-express epithelial and mesenchymal isoforms of p120-catenin. These findings support 4T1 cells as a model for carcinomas that possess hybrid traits of epithelial and mesenchymal states that promote invasion and metastasis. As such, the 4T1 model provides a platform for investigating strategies to reinstate E-cadherins ability to promote stable cell-cell junctions in E-cadherin-positive cancers, and for identifying which aspects of an epithelial phenotype may serve to facilitate the macroscopic growth of metastatic colonies.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.