Hospital Care Trajectories of Older Adults with Cancer and the Associated Clinical Profiles: linking a French Prospective Cohort Study and a Clinical Data Warehouse
Jean, C.; Paillaud, E.; Boudou-Rouquette, P.; Martinez-Tapia, C.; Pamoukdjian, F.; Hagege, M.; Breant, S.; Hassen-Khodja, C.; Natella, P.-A.; Cudennec, T.; Laurent, M.; Caillet, P.; Audureau, E.; Canouï-Poitrine, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe longitudinal hospital care experiences of older adults with cancer, from the treatment decision-making process until their end of life, remain unexplored. We examined the hospital care trajectories of these patients and identified associated clinical determinants. MethodsWe linked the ELCAPA multicenter cohort study (patients aged [≥]70 with a solid tumor and having been referred for a geriatric assessment between 2012 and 2019) and the Greater Paris University Hospitals clinical data warehouse. Individual care trajectories, defined as series of consultations, hospital admissions (in day, acute or rehabilitation units) and emergency room visits, were clustered using multichannel sequence analysis. Cluster membership determinants were identified among socio-demographic, oncological and geriatric parameters by logistic regression analysis. Results707 patients (median age: 82; metastatic cancer: 45.2%; 10,998 care episodes) were included. Four trajectory clusters were identified: cluster A (n=149, 21.1%) with in-hospital surgical trajectories, cluster B (n=198, 28.0%) with outpatient care trajectories with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, cluster C (n=302, 42.7%) without any hospital cancer treatments, and cluster D (n=58, 8.2%) with mostly chemotherapy and high hospital care consumption. Cluster belonging determinants included metastatic status and cancer site (for cluster A), cognition, mobility and mood status (unimpaired parameters for cluster B and impaired for cluster C), and younger age (for cluster D). ConclusionWhile highlighting varied hospital care experiences among older patients with cancer, we found that age remains an independent determinant of chemotherapy-dominant care trajectories.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 94%
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 92%
- Development and performance of a population-based risk stratification model for COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 94%
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 93%
- Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the US: a SEER-18 analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is age the most important risk factor in COVID-19 patients? The relevance of comorbidity burden: A retrospective analysis of 10,090 hospitalizations 92%
- Survival of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Northern Italy: a population-based cohort study by the ITA-COVID19 Network 91%
- Sixty-day mortality among 520 Italian hospitalized COVID-19 patients according to the adopted ventilatory strategy in the context of an integrated multidisciplinary clinical organization: a population-based cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. 93%
- Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study 92%
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.