Back

Distinct platelet interactions with soluble and immobilized von Willebrand factor modulate platelet adhesion and aggregation with differential impact on hemostasis and thrombosis

Chen, Y.; Ruggeri, Z. M.

2024-02-02 biophysics
10.1101/2024.01.31.578078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arterial thrombosis is a prevailing and lethal pathological condition that remains difficult to treat or prevent without potentially serious side effects, mostly hemorrhagic in nature. Platelets and von Willebrand factor (VWF) have a recognized major role in the pathogenesis of arterial thrombosis. Platelets bind to surface immobilized VWF for initial adhesion to injured vascular sites, but also interact with soluble VWF to aggregate into thrombi, particularly under flow conditions creating elevated shear stress. Whether the binding of immobilized and soluble VWF to platelets is regulated by separate mechanisms and how they respectively regulate hemostasis and thrombosis remains unclear. Using targeted mutagenesis we engineered VWF to achieve modified binding kinetics with the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP) Ib and discovered that the interactions of immobilized and soluble VWF with platelets can be differentially regulated with distinct consequences on platelet adhesion and aggregation. Based on these results, we studied a monoclonal antibody, NMC4, known to bind to an epitope in the VWFA1 domain and to inhibit preferentially platelet aggregation under elevated shear stress conditions. We found that NMC4 was less efficient in reducing platelet adhesion to immobilized VWF than platelet aggregation mediated by soluble VWF and, surprisingly, also inhibited arterial thrombosis in a mouse model of ferric chloride-induced carotid artery occlusion at a dose that failed to prolong post-injury bleeding. Thus, our current findings help delineate interrelated biochemical and biophysical mechanisms underlying VWF function in vascular health; and suggest selective inhibition of VWF-mediated platelet aggregation as opposed to adhesion as a strategy to prevent arterial thrombosis while minimizing bleeding complications.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
61.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
5
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
8
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
12
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
16
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
17
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
19
Matrix Biology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
20
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%