Back

Cooperativity of c-MYC with Krüppel-Like Factor 6 Splice Variant 1 induces phenotypic plasticity and promotes prostate cancer progression and metastasis

Izadmehr, S.; Fernandez-Hernandez, H.; Wiredja, D.; Kirschenbaum, A.; Lee-Poturalski, C.; Tavassoli, P.; Yao, S.; Schlatzer, D.; Hoon, D.; DiFeo, A.; Levine, A. C.; Mosquera, J.-M.; Galsky, M. D.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Narla, G.

2024-02-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.01.30.577982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metastasis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in men with prostate cancer, and the functional impact of the genetic alterations, alone or in combination, driving metastatic disease remains incompletely understood. The proto-oncogene c-MYC, commonly deregulated in prostate cancer. Transgenic expression of c-MYC is sufficient to drive the progression to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and ultimately to moderately differentiated localized primary tumors, however, c-MYC-driven tumors are unable to progress through the metastatic cascade, suggesting that a "second-hit" is necessary in the milieu of aberrant c-MYC-driven signaling. Here, we identified cooperativity between c-MYC and KLF6-SV1, an oncogenic splice variant of the KLF6 gene. Transgenic mice that co-expressed KLF6-SV1 and c-MYC developed progressive and metastatic prostate cancer with a histological and molecular phenotype like human prostate cancer. Silencing c-MYC expression significantly reduced tumor burden in these mice supporting the necessity for c-MYC in tumor maintenance. Unbiased global proteomic analysis of tumors from these mice revealed significantly enriched vimentin, a dedifferentiation and pro-metastatic marker, induced by KLF6-SV1. c-MYC-positive tumors were also significantly enriched for KLF6-SV1 in human prostate cancer specimens. Our findings provide evidence that KLF6-SV1 is an enhancer of c-MYC-driven prostate cancer progression and metastasis, and a correlated genetic event in human prostate cancer with potential translational significance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.6%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
6
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
7
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
16
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
18
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
20
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
22
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
25
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%