The collective application of shorebird tracking data to conservation
Harrison, A.-L.; Stenzel, C.; Anderson, A.; Howell, J.; Lanctot, R. B.; Aikens, M.; Aldabe, J.; Berigan, L. A.; Bety, J.; Blomberg, E.; Bosi de Almeida, J.; Boyce, A. J.; Bradley, D. W.; Brown, S.; Carlisle, J.; Cheskey, E.; Christie, K.; Christin, S.; Clay, R.; Dayer, A.; Deppe, J. L.; English, W.; Flemming, S. A.; Gilg, O.; Gilroy, C.; Heath, S.; Hill, J. M.; Hipfner, J. M.; Johnson, J. A.; Johnson, L.; Kempenaers, B.; Knaga, P.; Kwon, E.; Lagasse, B. J.; Lamarre, J.-F.; Latty, C.; Leandri-Breton, D.-J.; Lecomte, N.; Loring, P.; McDuffie, L. A.; McGuire, R.; Moorhead, S.; Navedo, J. G.; News
Show abstract
Addressing urgent conservation issues, like the drastic declines of North American migratory birds, requires creative, evidence-based, efficient, and collaborative approaches. Over 50% of monitored North American shorebird populations have lost over 50% of their abundance since 1980. To address these declines, we developed a partnership of scientists and practitioners called the Shorebird Science and Conservation Collective (hereinafter "the Collective"). Here, we present this successful case study as an example for others engaged in translational science. The Collective acts as an intermediary whereby dedicated staff collate and analyze data contributions from scientists to support knowledge requests from conservation practitioners. Data contributions from 74 organizations include over 6.7 million shorebird locations forming movement paths of 3,345 individuals representing 36 species tracked across the Americas. We describe the founding and structure of the Collective and conservation activities we supported in our first two years. As the volume of scientific data on animal movements continues to grow, groups like the Collective can be vital liaisons to rapidly integrate and interpret research to support conservation action.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.