Back

RAMDS: Retrieval Augmented Medical Diagnosis System for Explainable Breast Cancer Classification from Ultrasound Images.

Thomas, J.; Johnson, E. T.; Bande, J. K.

2024-02-02 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.01.30.24301967 medRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women, presents a growing challenge in medical diagnostics. Despite the effectiveness of mammography and ultrasound, the ambiguity in non-invasive scans often necessitates invasive procedures. Our primary goal was to create an AI model that could predict breast cancer with high negative predictive value and reduce unnecessary procedures. This study introduces the Retrieval-Augmented Medical Diagnosis System (RAMDS) for breast cancer, a novel approach combining an AI model with a retrieval-augmented mechanism to enhance diagnostic accuracy and explainability. The RAMDS employs a pretrained ResNet 34 model, fine-tuned on breast ultrasound image datasets from four countries. It integrates a similarity-based weighted adjustment mechanism to compare new cases with historical diagnoses. Its like having an experienced doctor who remembers every case theyve ever seen and uses that knowledge to make better decisions. RAMDS improved sensitivity by 11%, and negative predictive value by 9% when compared to the base model. Notably, the RAMDS improves explainability by linking AI predictions to similar historical cases, aligning with the medical communitys interest in transparent and understandable AI decisions. A unique feature of this system is its adaptability to varied imaging contexts without retraining, addressing the challenge of dataset variability across medical institutions. In conclusion, the RAMDS offers a significant advancement in breast cancer diagnosis, combining enhanced accuracy, explainability, and adaptability. It holds promise for clinical application, though further research is needed to optimize its performance and integrate multi-modal data.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
3
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.3%
5
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.2%
6
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
10
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
11
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
13
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
19
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
30
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%