Sex Disparity in Referral for Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation at a Single Integrated Health System
Gangadharan, A. A.; Muhammad, L. N.; Song, J.; Knight, B. P.; Passman, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundCatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFCA) is indicated for select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and has been shown to reduce AF burden and improve quality of life. Earlier studies demonstrated that women are less likely to undergo AFCA despite having more AF symptoms. We investigated whether an association exists between referral patterns and this sex disparity. Methods and ResultsA retrospective cohort study was conducted of outpatients with newly diagnosed AF using the electronic medical record at Northwestern. Of 5,445 patients analyzed, 2,108 were women, and 3,337 were men. Characteristics including race, insurance status, comorbidities, and prior AF treatment were compared by sex. Logistic regression models adjusted for socioeconomic and clinical factors were constructed to determine associations between sex and binary dependent variables including referrals to and visits with general cardiology and electrophysiology (EP) and utilization of AFCA. There were no significant differences in odds of referral to (aOR, 1.17 [0.92-1.48], P=0.20) or visits with (aOR, 1.03 [0.82-1.30], P=0.79) general cardiologists between women and men. There were no significant differences in odds of referral to (aOR, 0.83 [0.68-1.01], P=0.06) or visits with (aOR, 0.87 [0.72-1.05], P=0.15) electrophysiologists between women and men. Finally, no significant difference was found in likelihood to undergo AFCA between women and men (aOR, 1.08 [0.83-1.40], P=0.56). ConclusionsOur study demonstrates no significant differences in referral patterns to specialists or rates of AFCA between women and men. Encouraging equitable referral to specialists and access to AFCA is essential in ensuring appropriate care for all patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 95%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Surgical strategy for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiac and Perinatal Outcomes Among Pregnancies with Maternal Cardiac Arrhythmias 95%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 95%
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 97%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 95%
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 96%
- Clinical Outcomes, Management, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Cost According to the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Scores in Asian Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation 95%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 96%
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 92%
- Lifestyle physical activity intensity and rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.