Policy approaches to decarbonising the transport sector in Aotearoa/NZ: Equity, health and health system impacts
Shaw, C.; Mizdrak, A.; `Gage, R.; McLeod, M.; Jones, R.; Woodward, A.; Cobiac, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealth co-benefits are a key potential advantage of transport decarbonisation policy. However, health impacts will occur in the context of existing transport-health inequities and decarbonisation policies will themselves impact inequities. MethodsWe modelled the health, health system and environmental impacts of the Behaviour and Technology pathways developed by the New Zealand Climate Change Commission. Household transport related health impacts were modelled through the pathways of physical activity, air pollution (PM2{middle dot}5 and NO2) and injury for the New Zealand population from 2018 to 2050. We modelled impacts for M[a]ori (the Indigenous Peoples of Aotearoa) and non-M[a]ori. FindingsBoth pathways show improvements in population health, reductions in health system costs and reduced lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions compared to baseline, although health gains were substantially larger in the Behaviour pathway. Health gains were 20-30% larger for M[a]ori than non-M[a]ori in both pathways, although more healthy life years were gained by M[a]ori in the Behaviour pathway. For those aged 0-4 in 2018, healthy life expectancy differences between M[a]ori and non-M[a]ori reduced by 0{middle dot}5% in the Behaviour pathway. Healthy life years gained by M[a]ori and non-M[a]ori altered substantially depending on assumptions about the equity of the implemented pathway. InterpretationDecarbonising transport may reduce health and healthy life expectancy inequities between M[a]ori and non-M[a]ori if policies supporting decarbonisation are implemented equitably. Pathways that increase physical activity will have a much larger impact on population health than those which rely on low emission vehicles. Funding: Health Research Council of New Zealand (20/151) and University of Otago.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 91%
- Respiratory symptoms after coalmine fire and pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of the Hazelwood Health Study adult cohort 90%
- Mobility changes following COVID-19 stay-at-home policies varied by socioeconomic measures: An observational study in Ontario, Canada 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can we maximise the benefits of smoke-free prisons? Decision analytic model to predict potential impacts on public health 91%
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 90%
- COVID-19: Public Compliance with and Public Support for Stay-at-Home Mitigation Strategies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: a hierarchical spatial analysis 91%
- Residential exposure to green and blue spaces over childhood and cardiometabolic health outcomes: The Generation XXI birth cohort 90%
- Lifetime air pollution exposure from prenatal to 18 years and cardiovascular health in young adulthood: findings from a UK birth cohort 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 87%
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 87%
- Effectiveness of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia 87%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.