Mapping the developmental structure of stereotyped and individual-unique behavioral spaces in C. elegans
Harel, Y.; Nasser, R. A.; Stern, S.
Show abstract
Developmental patterns of behavior are variably organized in time and among different individuals. However, long-term behavioral diversity was previously studied using pre-defined behavioral parameters, representing a limited fraction of the full individuality structure. Here, we continuously extracted [~]1.2 billion body postures of [~]2,200 single C. elegans individuals throughout their full development time, to create a complete developmental atlas of stereotyped and individual-unique behavioral spaces. Unsupervised inference of low-dimensional movement modes of each single individual revealed a dynamic developmental trajectory of stereotyped behavioral spaces and exposed unique behavioral trajectories of individuals that deviate from the stereotyped patterns. Moreover, classification of behavioral spaces within tens of neuromodulatory- and environmentally-perturbed populations efficiently uncovered plasticity in the temporal structures of stereotyped behavior and individuality. These results present a comprehensive atlas of continuous behavioral dynamics across development time and a general framework for unsupervised dissection of shared and unique developmental signatures of behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hierarchical behavior control by a single class of interneurons 95%
- Assembly of a functional neuronal circuit in embryos of an ancestral metazoan is influenced by environmental signals including the microbiome 94%
- Conserved whole-brain spatiomolecular gradients shape adult brain functional organization 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.