Back

Comparison of the capacity of several machine learning tools to assist immunofluorescence-based detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies

Bertin, D.; Bongrand, P.; Bardin, N.

2024-01-28 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2024.01.26.24301725 medRxiv
Show abstract

The success of artificial intelligence and machine learning is an incentive to develop new algorithms to increase the rapidity and reliability of medical diagnosis. Here we compared different strategies aimed at processing microscope images used to detect anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, an important vasculitis marker: (i) basic classifier methods (logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors and decision tree) were used to process custom-made indices derived from immunofluorescence images yielded by 137 sera. (ii) These methods were combined with dimensional reduction to analyze 1733 individual cell images. iii) More complex models based on neural networks were used to analyze the same dataset. The efficiency of discriminating between positive and negative samples and different fluorescence patterns was quantified with Rand-type accuracy index, kappa index and ROC curve. It is concluded that basic models trained on a limited dataset allowed positive/negative discrimination with an efficiency comparable to that obtained by conventional analysis performed by humans (0.84 kappa score). More extensive datasets may be required for efficient discrimination between different fluorescence patterns generated by different auto-antibody species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.0%
3
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
10
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
22
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
23
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%