Person-Centred Care: Lessons from a service evaluation
Pearson, S.; Petsas, A.; Balabanovic, J.; Juj, M.; Harris, W.; Bonnici, T.
Show abstract
Context Critical care encompasses intensive care, intensive therapy and high dependency care and is operationalised when patients require specialised monitoring and intervention following complex surgery, or a life-threatening illness or injury. BackgroundDuring the pandemic, the Critical Care Department at UCLH formed a family liaison team to bridge the connection gap between patients, families, and clinical teams. This evolved into the Patient & Family Team (PFT), which organised several engagement events to understand patient and family experiences in critical care. MethodsFocus group discussions were conducted online and in-person with patients and bereaved families exploring their experience of the service. Discussions revolved around pivotal moments in the critical care journey. Feedback was analysed thematically and validated with the participants. FindingsPatients described their journey through four stages: Admission, Period of Disorientation, Re-Awakening, and Recovery. Bereaved families categorised their experiences into seven stages from The Phone Call to Bereavement. The need for effective and compassionate communication and support was evident for both groups. DiscussionFeedback revealed the emotional journeys of patients and families in critical care. While many experiences align with the existing literature, they also highlight areas for improvement, emphasising the value of human connection in healthcare. This study also demonstrated the need for continuous service evaluation and strategies for understanding underserved populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 97%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 96%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neonatal outcomes of preterm infants born during COVID-19 community lockdowns in Melbourne, Australia 87%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Feeding Practices and Complications in Patients with Critical Bronchiolitis on Non-invasive Respiratory Support 86%
- Different features of cholera in malnourished and non-malnourised children: analysis of 10-year surveillance data from a large diarrheal disease hospital in urban Bangladesh 85%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 94%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 91%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.