The interplay between dormant mutated cells and tumor promotion by chronic tissue damage in determining cancer risk.
Li, Y. R.; Kandyba, E.; Halliwill, K.; Delrosario, R.; Tran, Q.; Bayani, N.; Wu, D.; Mirzoeva, O.; Reeves, M. M.; Islam, M.; Riva, L.; Bergstrom, E. N.; Achanta, K.; Digiovanni, J.; Alexandrov, L.; Balmain, A.
Show abstract
While the causal role of mutagenic carcinogens in tumor development is well established, the relative contribution of environmental tumor promoting factors, wounding, and chronic inflammation is still unclear. Recent sequencing studies have suggested that most environmental carcinogens act as promoters rather than through mechanisms that involve direct induction of point mutations, but whether cancer risk factors such as obesity, chronic inflammation, wounding, or tumor promoters contribute directly or indirectly to mutation burden, or induce novel signatures, has not been investigated. Here, we present WGS analysis of over 100 mouse skin tumors to compare the effects of exposure to mutagens, the tumor promoter TPA, chronic wounding, obesity, or chemotherapy, on mutational burden and cancer risk. All tumors initiated by the carcinogen Dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) show a very strong A>T mutational signature (SBS.DMBA) attributable to a single exposure to this carcinogen. The number of SBS.DMBA mutations also showed a strong correlation with the "clock" signature SBS5, suggesting that one treatment with this mutagen can induce mutational signatures attributed to endogenous processes. No specific signatures could be attributed to obesity, high fat diet, wounding, or TPA. Cells carrying thousands of mutations persist over very long periods without inducing tumors or causing pathological changes but can give rise to tumors after short term exposure to TPA. Furthermore, normal cell turnover and proliferation during fetal and adult growth, is not sufficient for promotion, but tissue damage followed by regenerative proliferation seems to be required for tumor development. We conclude that tumor promoters, chronic inflammation, wounding, and obesity do not contribute significantly to tumor mutational burden, and that the rate-limiting determinant of tumor growth is exposure to a tumor promoter rather than the nature or number of genomic point mutations. These data are highly relevant to the recent demonstration of persistent oncogenic mutations in histologically normal human tissues during ageing.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Apolipoprotein E2 Promotes Melanoma Growth, Metastasis, and Protein Synthesis via the LRP1 Receptor 94%
- A Genomically and Clinically Annotated Patient Derived Xenograft (PDX) Resource for Preclinical Research in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 92%
- Estrogen receptor alpha mutations in breast cancer cells cause gene expression changes through constant activity and through secondary effects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-organ signaling mobilizes tumor-associated erythroid cells expressing immune checkpoint molecules 94%
- Platinum-Induced Ubiquitination of Phosphorylated H2AX by RING1A is Mediated by Replication Protein A in Ovarian Cancer 93%
- PKCδ regulates chromatin remodeling and DNA repair through SIRT6 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential roles of Rad18 in repressing carcinogen- and oncogene-driven mutagenesis in vivo 94%
- Inhibition of tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase impairs DNA damage tolerance and repair in glioma cells 92%
- The DNA Damage Response (DDR) landscape of endometrial cancer defines discrete disease subtypes and reveals therapeutic opportunities. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of distinct fibroblast lineages and immune cells in dermal repair following UV radiation induced tissue damage 93%
- STAT3 is a genetic modifier of TGF-beta induced EMT in KRAS mutant pancreatic cancer 93%
- DECR1 is an androgen-repressed survival factor that regulates PUFA oxidation to protect prostate tumor cells from ferroptosis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.