Back

Conformational changes of the ABC Transporter BmrA Depend on Membrane Curvature

Damm, A.; Paik, S.-J.; Sadhu, R. K.; Di Cicco, A.; Manzi, J.; Castellana, M.; Margeat, E.; Dahan, M.; Sens, P.; Levy, D.; Bassereau, P.

2024-10-26 biophysics
10.1101/2024.01.24.577054 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While mechanosensitive ion channels gating has been well documented, the effect of membrane mechanics, in particular membrane curvature, on the function of transporters remains elusive. Since conical shape transmembrane proteins locally deform membranes, conversely membrane bending could impact their conformations and their function. We tested this hypothesis using BmrA, a bacterial ABC exporter that exhibits large conformational changes upon ATP hydrolysis, switching between open and closed states with opposite V-shapes. After reconstitution in liposomes of different curvatures, and at two different temperatures, we showed that BmrA ATPase activity decreases by 2.9-fold when their diameter decreases from 125 to 29 nm. Moreover, using single-molecule FRET, we observed that the fraction of closed conformations is reduced in highly curved vesicles when adding ATP or non-hydrolysable AMP-PNP. Our results are well explained by a theoretical 2-states model including the effect of membrane mechanics on protein shape transition. Our work reveals that the functional cycle of conical transporters is curvature sensitive, to an extent depending on protein geometry. Significance StatementBiological membranes actively regulate protein function. While some ion channels are known to sense membrane tension, whether transporters also respond to mechanical cues was unknown. We show that the conical-shaped bacterial exporter BmrA is sensitive to membrane curvature, with both its activity and conformation landscape determined by the surrounding lipid bilayer. This reveals a previously unrecognized mechanism of mechanosensitivity, suggesting that membrane geometry and transporter shape are intrinsically coupled, providing a general principle of regulation across biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.