PP2B-dependent cerebellar plasticity sets the amplitude of an innate reflex during juvenile development
Wu, B.; Post, L.; Lin, Z.; Schonewille, M.
Show abstract
Throughout life, the cerebellum plays a central role in the coordination and optimization of movements, using cellular plasticity to adapt a range of behaviors. If these plasticity processes establish a fixed setpoint during development, or continuously adjust behaviors throughout life, is currently unclear. Here, by spatiotemporally manipulating the activity of protein phosphatase 2B (PP2B), an enzyme critical for cerebellar plasticity, we examined the consequences of disrupted plasticity on the performance and adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). We find that, in contrast to Purkinje cell specific deletion starting early postnatally, acute pharmacological as well as adult-onset genetic deletion of PP2B affects all forms of VOR adaptation, but not the level of VOR itself. Next, we show that Purkinje cell-specific genetic deletion of PP2B in juvenile mice leads to a progressive loss of the protein PP2B and a concurrent change in the VOR, in addition to the loss of adaptive abilities. Finally, re-expressing PP2B in adult mice that lack PP2B expression from early in development, rescues VOR adaptation, but does not affect the performance of the reflex. Together, our results indicate that chronic or acute, genetic or pharmacological block of PP2B disrupts the adaptation of the VOR. In contrast, only the absence of plasticity during cerebellar development affects the setpoint of VOR, an effect that cannot be corrected after maturation of the cerebellum. These findings suggest that cerebellar plasticity influences behavior in two ways, through direct control of behavioral adaptation and via long-term effects initiated in the juvenile period. Significance StatementEarly damage to motor adaptation structures, such as the cerebellum, has been linked to neurodevelopmental disorders persisting into adulthood. Understanding these long-term effects requires disentangling the persistent, long-term effects of disrupted development from the acute, ongoing effects directly caused by the continuous presence of the disruption. Here, we demonstrate that disruptions during early development affect both basal level and adaptation, whereas late, adult-onset disruption of cerebellar plasticity only affects the ability to adapt, not the setpoint of an innate reflex. Our findings that specifically the absence of plasticity during cerebellar development affects the setpoint of VOR, which cannot be corrected by re-instating plasticity after maturation of the cerebellum, supports the concept of a sensitive developmental period for setting innate reflexes.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Calsyntenin-3, an atypical cadherin, suppresses inhibitory basket- and stellate-cell synapses but boosts excitatory parallel-fiber synapses in cerebellum 96%
- Pull-Push Neuromodulation Of Cortical Plasticity Enables Rapid Bi-Directional Shifts In Ocular Dominance 96%
- Activation of MAP3K DLK and LZK in Purkinje Cells Causes Rapid and Slow Degeneration Depending on Signaling Strength 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Activation of somatostatin interneurons by nicotinic modulator Lypd6 enhances plasticity and functional recovery in the adult mouse visual cortex 96%
- Dissociable Roles of Pallidal Neuron Subtypes in Regulating Motor Patterns 95%
- A role for thalamic projection GABAergic neurons in circadian responses to light 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhibition of mTOR during a postnatal sensitive window rescues deficits in GABAergic PV cell connectivity and social behavior caused by loss of TSC1. 95%
- Sensory input drives rapid homeostatic scaling of the axon initial segment in mouse barrel cortex 94%
- Siah2 integrates mitogenic and extracellular matrix signalslinking neuronal progenitor ciliogenesis with germinal zoneoccupancy. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.