The Impact of Anesthesia on Ultrasonic Glymphatic Perturbation Protocol: Alertness, and Glymphatic Influx
Xiao, H.; Shrestha, B.; Cruz, A. A.; Iliff, J.; Porter, T.; Aryal, M.
Show abstract
We have recently discovered that transcranial low-intensity focused ultrasound can enhance glymphatic transport, which facilitates the removal of waste metabolites from the brain in a preclinical rat model [1]. The central hypothesis was that ultrasound, functioning as a pressure wave, has the potential to influence the convective forces generated by arterial pulsations, which are also pressure waves, serving as the primary mechanism for glymphatic transport. Importantly, our data revealed that (i) the ultrasound protocol (650 kHz at 0.2MPa for 10 minutes to the entire brain) is safe, as histological evaluations showed no parenchymal damage and no difference in levels of neuronal degeneration or astrocytic activation 72 hours after the intervention, and (ii) the required pressure is significantly low, 10 times below FDA-approved limits for diagnostic ultrasound, and can be achieved using existing FDA-approved clinical transcranial focused ultrasound systems, suggesting its ease of translation into clinical applications. However, the study was conducted under specific physiological states with approximately 2.5% isoflurane-induced anesthesia. There is a limitation in fully understanding the potential bioeffects of ultrasound within the glymphatic space across various physiological conditions, primarily because the glymphatic transports efficiency fluctuates with anesthetically induced physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols of ultrasonic glymphatic transport at optimal physiological state is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research laboratories during the preclinical development of this technique. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate how ultrasonically manipulated glymphatic transport is influenced by different levels of isoflurane-induced anesthetic conditions, including 3% (just above 2.5%), 2% (slightly below 2.5%), and 1.5% (quasi-awake state, resembling the existing clinical practice of ultrasound treatment). Results show that the impact of ultrasound during glymphatic transport depends on the level of anesthesia. It increases alertness in lightly anesthetized animals and improves glymphatic transport, while it induces drowsiness in heavily anesthetized animals, leading to reduced glymphatic transport. The results suggest that lighter anesthesia is beneficial for efficient ultrasonic glymphatic transport, making it more in line with the awake state in current clinical ultrasound treatments, thus advancing the technology closer to clinical translation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced capillary delivery with nanobubble-mediated blood-brain barrier opening and advanced high resolution vascular segmentation 95%
- Focused ultrasound blood brain barrier opening mediated delivery of MRI-visible albumin nanoclusters to the rat brain for localized drug delivery with temporal control 94%
- Low-frequency ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening enables non-invasive lipid nanoparticle RNA delivery to glioblastoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- TRPV1-mediated sonogenetic neuromodulation of motor cortex in freely moving mice 95%
- Transcranial photoacoustic imaging of NMDA-evoked focal circuit dynamics in rat hippocampus 94%
- Transcranial photoacoustic characterization of neurovascular physiology during early-stage photothrombotic stroke in neonatal piglets in vivo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pumpless Microfluidic Neonatal Lung Assist Device for Support of Preterm Neonates in Respiratory Distress 92%
- Enhancing glymphatic function with very low-intensity ultrasound via the transient receptor potential vanilloid-4-aquaporin-4 pathway 92%
- Micromotion derived fluid shear stress mediates peri-electrode gliosis through mechanosensitive ion channels 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.