Back

Explaining plant trait variation in response to soil water availability using an optimal height-growth model

Towers, I. R.; O'Reilly Nugent, A.; Sabot, M. E. B.; Vesk, P. A.; Falster, D. S.

2024-01-26 ecology
10.1101/2024.01.23.576942 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Climate change is expected to bring about changes in precipitation and temperature regimes that, together with rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, will likely reorganise the functional trait composition of ecosystems. Predicting plant trait responses to emerging environmental conditions including, in particular, water availability, is a tremendous challenge, but is one that eco-evolutionary optimality theory (EEO) can help us undertake. However, most EEO approaches are based on the hypothesis that traits are selected to maximise carbon assimilation which omits the important role that size growth plays in determining fitness outcomes. Using a height-growth based EEO framework, we predict magnitude and directional shifts in four key traits: leaf mass per area, sapwood area to leaf area ratio (Huber value), wood density and sapwood-specific conductivity in response to variation in soil moisture availability, atmospheric aridity, CO2 and light availability. Consistent with empirical patterns, we predict that trait optima shift from resource-acquisitive strategies characterised by low tissue constructions costs and high rates of tissue turnover and sapwood conductivity to resource-conservative strategies - characterised by low rates of tissue turnover and greater xylem embolism resistance - as conditions become increasingly dry. The EEO model that we use here highlights the important role that both carbon assimilation and tissue construction costs jointly play in predicting the response of trait optima to the environment, laying the groundwork for future height-growth based EEO models aiming to predict shifts in the functional composition of ecosystems in response to global change.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.1%
3
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
4
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
5
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
14
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
15
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
17
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
20
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
23
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%