Back

Underlying molecular effects to behavioral consequences present line of evidence for zebrafish eye development and function alteration by crude oil exposure.

Mueller, L. K.; Johann, S.; Denecke, B.; Abdallah, A. T.; Hecker, M.; Hollert, H.; Seiler, T.-B.

2024-01-24 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.01.23.576882 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Crude oil can affect the normal eye development and swimming behavior of fish embryos. In this study 0-4 hours post fertilization (hpf) zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos were exposed to low, sublethal concentrations of water-accommodated fractions (WAF) of a naphthenic North Sea crude oil alone and in combination with a third-generation chemical dispersant. Effects on eye development and function at the transcript, histological, morphological, and behavioral level were assessed relative to untreated control specimen at 119 hpf. Exposed embryos swam significantly less during the dark phases of the light/dark transition test. Eye size of zebrafish embryos was significantly smaller in groups exposed to crude oil WAFs. Zebrafish retina histology revealed that, among other structural alterations, the outer nuclear layer, containing photoreceptor cells relevant for normal visual functioning, was significantly thinner in exposed embryos. Transcriptome analysis revealed that several genes involved in eye development and function (opsins and crystallins) were dysregulated upon oil exposure. The molecular effects on gene expression and eye histology results form a novel line of evidence that explains the observed effects of crude oil on the swimming activity of exposed fish embryos. The present study is in line with recent findings highlighting the importance of ocular toxicity in developing embryos exposed to petroleum samples at environmentally relevant and non-lethal concentrations without visible malformations. The study suggests that oculotoxicity should be considered as a major toxicity pathway alongside to the well-established cardiotoxicity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.