Integrative single-cell multi-omics of CD19CARpos and CARneg T cells suggest drivers of immunotherapy response in B-cell neoplasias
Guerrero-Murillo, M.; Rill-Hinarejos, A.; Trincado, J. L.; Bataller, A.; Ortiz-Maldonado, V.; Benitez-Ribas, D.; Espanol, M.; Gonzalez, E. A.; Martinez-Cibrian, N.; Marchese, D.; Martin-Martin, L.; Garcia-Sancho, A. M.; Heyn, H.; Juan, M.; Urbano-Ispizua, A.; Delgado, J.; Orfao, A.; Mereu, E.; Bueno, C.; Menendez, P.
Show abstract
How phenotypic, clonal, and functional heterogeneity of CAR-T-cells impact clinical outcomes remain understudied. Here, we integrated clonal kinetics with transcriptomic heterogeneity resolved by single-cell omics to explore cellular dynamics response of both non-transduced (CARneg) and transduced (CARpos)T-cells. CARneg and CARposT-cells were longitudinally interrogated in the manufactured infusion product (IP) and in-vivo at CAR-T cell expansion peak in five B-ALL patients treated with CD19CAR-T-cells (varni-cel). Significant differences were found in the cellular dynamics between CARpos and CARnegT-cells in response to therapy. CARposT-cells in the IP exhibited a significant higher CD4:CD8 ratio than CARnegT-cells, and the CD4:CD8 CARposT-cell composition impacted therapy outcome as confirmed in a larger cohort of 24 varni-cel-treated B-ALL patients. Conversely, an inverted trend in the CD4:CD8 CARposT-cell ratio was consistently observed at the expansion peak, with clonally expanding CD8+ effector memory and cytotoxic T-cells being the most abundant populations. Expanded cytotoxic CARpos{gamma}{delta}T cells emerged at the expansion peak, and the extent of their in-vivo expansion positively correlated with treatment efficacy, which was validated in a large cohort of B-ALL patients (n=18) treated with varni-cell and B-cell lymphoma patients (n=58) treated with either lisa-cel or axi-cel. Our data provide insights into the complexity and diversity of T-cell responses following CAR-T cell therapy and suggest drivers of immunotherapy response.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Stage CD8+ CAR T-Cell Differentiation in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma 98%
- Role of Stem-Like Cells in Chemotherapy Resistance and Relapse in pediatric T Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 97%
- Immunometabolic determinants of long-term response in leukemia patients receiving CD19 CAR T cell therapy 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- An ex vivo human bone marrow milieu identifies CDH2 as a driver of niche-mediated treatment resistance in leukaemia 96%
- Rewired type I IFN signaling is linked to age-dependent differences in COVID-19 94%
- Longitudinal characterization of circulating neutrophils uncovers distinct phenotypes associated with disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling IKZF1 lesions in B-ALL reveals distinct chemosensitivity patterns and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities 96%
- Neoantigen Landscape Supports Feasibility of Personalized Cancer Vaccine for Follicular Lymphoma 95%
- Hematopoietic fitness of JAK2 V617F Myeloproliferative Neoplasms is linked to clinical outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- AML/T cell interactomics uncover correlates of patient outcomes and the key role of ICAM1 in T cell killing of AML 96%
- Improved CAR-T cell activity associated with increased mitochondrial function primed by galactose 95%
- Identification of leukemia stem cell subsets with distinct transcriptional, epigenetic and functional properties 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A single cell framework identifies functionally and molecularly distinct multipotent progenitors in adult human hematopoiesis 96%
- Defective ribosome assembly impairs leukemia stem cell function in a murine model of acute myeloid leukemia 95%
- Inhibition of mutant IDH1 promotes cycling of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.