Back

A comprehensive ML-based Respiratory Monitoring System for Physiological Monitoring & Resource Planning in the ICU

Hüser, M.; Lyu, X.; Faltys, M.; Pace, A.; Hoche, M.; Hyland, S. L.; Yeche, H.; Burger, M.; Merz, T. M.; Rätsch, G.

2024-01-23 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.01.23.24301516 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (RF) occurs frequently in critically ill patients and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and increased resource use. We used machine learning to create a comprehensive monitoring system to assist intensive care unit (ICU) physicians in managing acute RF. The system encompasses early detection and ongoing monitoring of acute hypoxemic RF, assessment of readiness for tracheal extubation and prediction of the risk of extubation failure. In study patients, the model predicted 80% of RF events at a precision of 45%, with 65% of RF events identified more than 10 hours before RF onset. System predictive performance was significantly higher than standard clinical monitoring based on the patients oxygenation index and was successfully validated in an external cohort of ICU patients. We have demonstrated how the estimated risk of extubation failure (EF) could facilitate prevention of both, extubation failure and unnecessarily prolonged mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, we illustrated how machine-learning-based monitoring of RF risk, along with the necessity for mechanical ventilation and extubation readiness on a patient-by-patient basis, can facilitate resource planning for mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Specifically, our model predicted ICU-level ventilator use within 8 to 16 hours into the future, with a mean absolute error of 0.4 ventilators per 10 patients of effective ICU capacity.

Published in npj Digital Medicine (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.