Back

Body size is a better predictor of intra- than interspecific variation of animal stoichiometry across realms

Nessel, M. P.; Dezerald, O.; Merder, J.; Andraczek, K.; Brose, U.; Filipiak, M.; Jackson, M.; Jochum, M.; Harpole, S.; Hillebrand, H.; Leroux, S. J.; Onstein, R.; Paseka, R.; Perry, G.; Rugenski, A.; Sitters, J.; Sperfeld, E.; Striebel, M.; Zandona, E.; Doi, H.; Eisenhauer, N.; Farjalla, V. F.; Gotelli, N. J.; Hood, J.; Kratina, P.; Moody, E. K.; Nash, L. N.; Potapov, A. M.; Romero, G. Q.; Roussel, J.-M.; Scheu, S.; Seeber, J.; Susanti, W. I.; Tiunov, A.; Gonzalez, A. L.

2024-01-25 ecology
10.1101/2024.01.22.576743 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animal stoichiometry affects fundamental processes ranging from organismal physiology to global element cycles. However, it is unknown whether animal stoichiometry follows predictable scaling relationships with body mass and whether adaptation to life on land or water constrains patterns of elemental allocation. To test both interspecific and intraspecific body-size scaling relationships of the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and N:P content of animals, we used a subset of the StoichLife database encompassing 9,933 individual animals (vertebrates and invertebrates) belonging to 1,543 species spanning 10 orders of magnitude of body size from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Across species, body mass did not explain much variation in %N and %P composition, although the %P of invertebrates decreased with size. The effects of body size on species elemental content were small in comparison to the effects of taxonomy. Body size was a better predictor of intraspecific than interspecific elemental patterns. Between 42 to 45% in intraspecific stoichiometric variation was explained by body size for 27% of vertebrate species and 35% of invertebrate species. Further, differences between organisms inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial realms were observed only in invertebrate interspecific %N, suggesting that the realm does not play an important role in determining elemental allocation of animals. Based on our analysis of the most comprehensive animal stoichiometry database, we conclude that (i) both body size and realm are relatively weak predictors of animal stoichiometry across taxa, and (ii) body size is a good predictor of intraspecific variation in animal elemental content, which is consistent with tissue-scaling relationships that hold broadly across large groups of animals. This research reveals a lack of general scaling patterns in the elemental content across animals and instead points to a large variation in scaling relationships within and among lineages.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.0%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
14
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
27
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%