How to measure bacterial genome plasticity? A novel time-integrated index helps gather insights on pathogens
Bellinzona, G.; Batisti Biffignandi, G.; Baldanti, F.; Brilli, M.; Sassera, D.; Gaiarsa, S.
Show abstract
Genome plasticity can be defined as the capacity of a bacterial population to swiftly gain or lose genes. The time factor plays a fundamental role for the evolutionary success of microbes, particularly when considering pathogens and their tendency to gain antimicrobial resistance factors under the pressure of the extensive use of antibiotics. Multiple metrics have been proposed to provide insights into the gene content repertoire, yet they overlook the temporal component, which has a critical role in determining the adaptation and survival of a bacterial strain. In this study, we introduce a novel index that incorporates the time dimension to assess the rate at which bacteria exchange genes, thus fitting the definition of plasticity. Opposite to available indexes, our method also takes into account the possibility of contiguous genes being transferred together in one single event. We applied our novel index to measure plasticity in three widely studied bacterial species: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. Our results highlight distinctive plasticity patterns in specific sequence types and clusters, suggesting a possible correlation between heightened genome plasticity and globally recognized high-risk clones. Our approach holds promise as an index for predicting the emergence of strains of potential clinical concern, possibly allowing for timely and more effective interventions. Impact statementHow quickly bacterial populations can acquire new functions is the key to their evolutionary success. This speed, called genome plasticity, is particularly relevant for human pathogens, especially when considering the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance. Today, the availability of large numbers of genomes from public databases makes it possible to develop a way to measure plasticity. However, none is currently available, besides indexes of gene content variability, which do not take into account the rate at which such gene content changes. In this work, we developed a plasticity index, called Flux Of Gene Segments (FOGS), and we tested it on large datasets of bacterial pathogen genomes. Interestingly, the subpopulations of the selected species that showed higher FOGS correspond to globally emerging high-risk clones. Therefore, we suggest that our index might be used not only to detect but also to predict emerging strains of human health concern. Data summaryThe authors confirm that all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phylum barrier and Escherichia coli intra-species phylogeny drive the acquisition of resistome in E. coli 96%
- Hospital outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales associated with an OXA-48 plasmid carried mostly by Escherichia coli ST399 95%
- Visualizing and quantifying structural diversity around mobile resistance genes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary route of resistant genes in Staphylococcus aureus 95%
- Comparative genomics reveals multipartite genomes undergoing loss in the fungal endosymbiotic genus Mycetohabitans 94%
- Global emergence and dissemination of Neisseria gonorrhoeae ST-9363 isolates with reduced susceptibility to azithromycin 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenomic assemblies tend to break around antibiotic resistance genes 93%
- In silico secretome characterization of clinical Mycobacterium abscessus isolates provides insights into antigenic differences 93%
- Unexpected diversity of CRISPR unveils some evolutionary patterns of repeated sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.