Drivers of Bird Communities in an Urban Neighborhood Vary by Scale
Darracq, A. K.; Bliznick, C.; Yeager, R.; Turner, J.; Pease, J.; Whiteman, H.; Smith, T.; Bhatnagar, A.
Show abstract
Given the accelerated pace of global biodiversity loss and rapid urbanization, it is becoming increasingly urgent to identify ways to minimize the costs and maximize the benefits of urban environments for wild flora and fauna. For instance, it has been estimated that 48% of all bird species are experiencing population declines. One of the main drivers of these declines is habitat loss and degradation associated with urbanization. Increased urbanization necessitates a better understanding of how to conserve birds in urban areas. Although relationships between urbanization and bird communities have been explored extensively, few studies have been conducted in residential neighborhoods, and the influence of urban environmental conditions, particularly air pollution, on bird communities remains unclear. In this study, we examined relationships between bird community metrics and environmental measures related to vegetation and air pollution within a residential neighborhood at multiple spatial scales. We found that bird species richness and the average number of native species were positively related to greenness (as measured by the normalized difference vegetation index; NDVI) within 50 m, and negatively associated with ambient levels of NO2 at 200 m. Similarly, we found the Hill-Shannon diversity index was positively associated with canopy cover, but negatively associated with NO2 at 200 m. The average number of invasive bird species, however, was negatively correlated with canopy cover at 50 m. The average number of native birds was negatively related to ultrafine particle (<100 nm in diameter) concentration. Unlike native bird abundances, invasive bird abundances were not sensitive to NO2 or ultrafine particles. Thus, our research suggests that reductions in air pollution, in combination with greening efforts that increase NDVI and canopy cover via the restoration of vegetation within urban neighborhoods, are likely to increase bird diversity and the abundances of native birds while reducing the abundance of invasive birds.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of contaminants, health and survival of migratory shorebirds in natural versus artificial wetlands - the potential of wastewater treatment plants as alternative habitats 94%
- COVID-19 in New York state: Effects of demographics and air quality on infection and fatality 93%
- Urban green infrastructure fails to mitigate exposure to mercury with increasing pollution levels: evidence from corvids 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vigilance response of a key prey species to anthropogenic and natural threats in Detroit 93%
- Extreme hot weather has stronger impacts on avian reproduction in forests than in cities 93%
- Microclimate, CO2 and CH4 concentration on Blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) nests: effects of brood size, nestling age and on ectoparasites 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nomadic ungulate movements under threat: Declining mobility of Mongolian gazelles in the Eastern Steppe. 92%
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 92%
- Anthropogenic supply of nutrients in a wildlife reserve may compromise conservation success 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.