GWAS of ~30,000 samples with bone mineral density at multiple skeletal sites and its clinical relevance on fracture prediction, genetic correlations and prioritization of drug targets
QIAN, Y.; Wei, J.; Wang, P.; Xie, C.; Lin, H.-L.; Li, G. H.-Y.; Yuan, C.-D.; Qiu, M.-C.; fang, Y.-h.; Yu, C.-F.; Cai, X.-C.; Khederzadeh, S.; Zhao, P.-P.; Yang, M.-Y.; Zhong, J.-D.; Li, X.; Guan, P.-L.; Gu, J.-X.; Gai, S.-R.; Yi, X.-J.; Tao, J.-G.; Chen, X.; Miao, M.-M.; jin, W.; Xu, L.; Xie, S.-Y.; Tian, G.; Yue, H.; Li, G.; Xiao, W.; Karasik, D.; Xu, Y.; Yang, L.; Huang, F.; Cheung, C.-L.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, H.
Show abstract
We conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived bone mineral density (BMD) traits at 11 skeletal sites, within over 30,000 European individuals from the UK Biobank. A total of 92 unique and independent loci were identified for 11 DXA-derived BMD traits and fracture, including five novel loci (harboring genes such as ABCA1, CHSY1, CYP24A1, SWAP70, and PAX1) for six BMD traits. These loci exhibited evidence of association in both males and females, which could serve as independent replication. We demonstrated that polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were independently associated with fracture risk. Although incorporating multiple PRSs (metaPRS) with the clinical risk factors (i.e., the FRAX model) exhibited the highest predictive performance, the improvement was marginal in fracture prediction. The metaPRS were capable of stratifying individuals into different trajectories of fracture risk, but clinical risk factors played a more significant role in the stratification. Additionally, we uncovered genetic correlation and shared polygenicity between head BMD and intracranial aneurysm. Finally, by integrating gene expression and GWAS datasets, we prioritized genes (e.g. ESR1 and SREBF1) encoding druggable human proteins along with their respective inhibitors/antagonists. In conclusion, this comprehensive investigation revealed a new genetic basis for BMD and its clinical relevance on fracture prediction. More importantly, it was suggested that head BMD was genetically correlated with intracranial aneurysm. The prioritization of genetically supported targets implied the potential repurposing drugs (e.g. the n-3 PUFA supplement targeting SREBF1) for the prevention of osteoporosis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolomics insights into osteoporosis through association with bone mineral density 94%
- Identification of known and novel long non-coding RNAs potentially responsible for the effects of BMD GWAS loci 94%
- Estimating the incidence and key risk factors of cardiovascular disease in patients at high risk of imminent fracture using routinely collected real-world data from the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Osteocyte Transcriptome Mapping Identifies a Molecular Landscape Controlling Skeletal Homeostasis and Susceptibility to Skeletal Disease 96%
- Accelerating functional gene discovery in osteoarthritis 93%
- Genetic correlates of vitamin D-binding protein and 25 hydroxyvitamin D in neonatal dried blood spots 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell type-specific network analysis in Diversity Outbred mice identifies genes potentially responsible for human bone mineral density GWAS associations 95%
- Genetic insights into ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine 94%
- MicroRNA-27a is essential for bone remodeling by modulating p62-mediated osteoclast signaling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Response eQTLs, chromatin accessibility, and 3D chromatin structure in chondrocytes provide mechanistic insight into osteoarthritis risk 94%
- Multi-trait genome-wide association study in 34,394 Chinese women reveals the genetic architecture of plasma metabolites during pregnancy 93%
- The HUNT Study: a population-based cohort for genetic research 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.