A new method for removing artifacts from recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential: Single-pulse stimulation
Skidmore, J.; Yuan, Y.; He, S.
Show abstract
This report presents a new method for removing electrical artifact contamination from the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) evoked by single cathodic-leading, biphasic-pulse stimulation. The development of the new method is motivated by results recorded in human cochlear implant (CI) users showing that the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking artifact rejection technique is violated in up to 45% of cases tested at high stimulation levels when using default stimulation parameters. Subsequently, the new method developed based on the discovery that a hyperbola best characterizes the artifacts created during stimulation and recording is described. The eCAP waveforms obtained using the new method are compared to those recorded using the classic forward masking technique. The results show that eCAP waveforms obtained using both methods are comparable when the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking technique is met. In contrast, eCAP amplitudes obtained using the two methods are significantly different when the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking technique is violated, with greater differences in the eCAP amplitude for greater assumption violations. The new method also has excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation > 0.98). Overall, the new method is a viable alternative to the classic forward masking technique for obtaining artifact-free eCAPs evoked by single-pulse stimulation in CI users.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between the auditory nerve’s ability to recover from neural adaptation, cortical encoding of and perceptual sensitivity to within-channel temporal gaps in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users 97%
- The relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential and cochlear implant speech perception outcomes 94%
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter? 95%
- Optimal sigmoid function models for analysis of transspinal evoked potential recruitment curves recorded from different muscles 95%
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal Multichannel Artifact Prediction and Removal for Brain Machine Interfaces and Neural Prosthetics 96%
- Endogenous signals during active movement predict deep brain stimulation evoked potential pathways: Results of a transfer function analysis 94%
- Neural correlates of masked and unmasked tones: psychoacoustics and late auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure-function coupling reveals seizure onset connectivity patterns 88%
- An image processing protocol to extract variables predictive of human embryo fitness for assisted reproduction 88%
- SelectStitch: Automated Frame Segmentation and Stitching to Create Composite Images from Otoscope Video Clips 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech in noise performance in adults with cochlear implants using a combined channel deactivation strategy with a variable number of dynamic focused channels 96%
- Effects of Electrical Pulse Polarity Shape on Intra Cochlear Neural Responses in Humans: Triphasic Pulses with Anodic and Cathodic Second Phase 96%
- ABRpresto: An algorithm for automatic thresholding of the Auditory Brainstem Response using resampled cross-correlation across subaverages 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.