Back

Testing microbial biomining from asteroidal material onboard the International Space Station

Santomartino, R.; Rodriguez Blanco, G.; Gudgeon, A.; Hafner, J. H.; Stirpe, A.; Waterfall, M.; Cayzer, N.; Pichevin, L.; Calder, G.; Birkenfeld, K. R.; Waajen, A. C.; McLaughlin, S.; Mariani, A.; Balsamo, M.; Neri, G.; Eades, L. J.; Cockell, C.

2024-01-14 microbiology
10.1101/2024.01.13.575412 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Expanding human space exploration beyond Earths orbit necessitates efficient technologies for self-sustainable acquisition of local resources to overcome unviable resupply missions from Earth. Potential source of materials are asteroids, some of which contain valuable metals, such as platinum group elements. The BioAsteroid experiment, performed onboard the International Space Station, tested the use of microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) to carry out mining of useful elements from asteroidal material (L-chondrite) under microgravity, in support of a long-term human presence in space. The fungus Penicillium simplicissimum, enhanced the mean release of palladium, platinum and other elements from the meteorite material in microgravity, compared to non-biological leaching. However, there was large variability in the results. For many elements, non-biological leaching under microgravity was enhanced compared to terrestrial gravity, while bioleaching was unaffected. Metabolomics results revealed clear patterns that highlight the influence of space conditions on the microbial metabolism, particularly for P. simplicissimum. We identified the presence of carboxylic acids, and molecules of potential biomining and pharmaceutical interest, enhanced in microgravity. These results show a non-trivial effect of microgravity on bioleaching, highlighting the requirement of an optimal combination of microorganism(s), rock substrate, and conditions for successful biomining, both in space and Earth.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.