Back

Comparing DOACs with warfarin in AF patients with chronic kidney disease or valvular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Liang, A.; Wang, C.; Iansavichene, A.; Lazo-Langner, A.

2024-01-15 hematology
10.1101/2024.01.13.24301121
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the safety and efficacy of different direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) compared to warfarin in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular disease or concomitant AF and chronic kidney disease (CKD). MethodsWe conducted literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM Reviews to examine randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that included the aforementioned patient populations treated with warfarin or DOAC (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban) and assessed outcomes of bleeding, stroke, or systemic/arterial thromboembolism. Meta-analysis was performed for eligible studies using the Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects model. Results3,172 studies were screened and 154 studies were selected after two levels of screening. Meta-analysis showed that, in patients with concomitant AF and CKD, DOAC was associated with reduced bleeding in non-RCTs (OR 0.65, 95% Cl [0.49, 0.86], p=0.003), particularly in more severe CKD (eGFR < 60mL/min/1.73m2). Apixaban in particular was associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% Cl [0.44, 0.63], p<0.00001) and stroke incidence (OR 0.60, 95% Cl [0.41, 0.87], p=0.007). In patients with concomitant AF and valvular disease, DOAC was associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.75, 95% CI [0.57, 0.97], p=0.03) and stroke incidence (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.47, 0.93], p=0.02) in non-RCTs. ConclusionOur study studied populations that are typically excluded from large-scale anticoagulation studies and our findings suggest that DOACs may be superior to warfarin both in the prevention of thromboembolic event and in the reduction of bleeding risks in patients with concomitant CKD or valvular disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 13%
22.4%
2
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 0.7%
8.5%
4
British Journal of Haematology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 6%
3.2%
7
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 0.9%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 56%
2.7%
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 33%
2.6%
11
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 11%
1.3%
15
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
16
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Tropical Medicine & International Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
18
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BioMed Research International
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 8%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 11%
0.8%