Strategic Debulking of the Femoral Stem Promotes Load Sharing Through Controlled Flexural Rigidity of the Implant Wall: Optimization of Design by Finite Element Analysis.
Sunavala-Dossabhoy, G.; Saba, B. M.; McCarthy, K. J.
Show abstract
Hip arthroplasty prostheses are often constructed of metal alloys, and the inherent disparity in the modulus of elasticity between the implant and the femur is attributed to the altered stress-strain pattern in adjacent bone. Rigid implants shield surrounding bone from mechanical loading, and the reduction in skeletal stress required to maintain bone mass and density results in accelerated bone loss, the forerunner to implant loosening and implant failure. Femoral stems of various geometric profiles and surface modifications, materials and material distributions for graded functionality, and porous stem structures have been investigated to achieve mechanical properties of stems that are closer to bone to mitigate stress shielding. For improved load transfer from implant to femur, the proposed study investigated a strategic debulking effort to impart controlled flexibility while retaining sufficient strength and endurance properties of the femoral stem. Using an iterative design process, debulked configurations based on an internal skeletal truss framework were evaluated using finite element analysis as outlined in ISO 7206 standards, with implants offset in natural femur or potted in testing cylinders. The commonality across the debulked designs was the minimization of proximal stress shielding compared to conventional solid implants. Stem topography can influence performance, and the truss implants with and without the calcar collar were evaluated. Load sharing was equally effective irrespective of the collar however, the collar was critical to reducing the stresses in the implant. When bonded directly to bone or cemented in the femur, the truss stem was effective at limiting stress shielding. Nevertheless, a localized increase in principal stress at the lateral proximal junction could negatively affect cement integrity and the bonding of cemented implants. The study determined that superior biomechanical performance of the truss implant is realized with a collared stem that is placed in an interference fit. Mechanistically, the controlled accommodation of deformation of the implant wall provides contextual flexibility and load sharing characteristics to the truss implant.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: an in vitro study 95%
- Development of the mandibular curve of Spee and maxillary compensating curve: A finite element model 94%
- A way to break bones? The weight of intuitiveness 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Aging-related mechanical degradation of cortical bone is driven by microstructural changes in addition to porosity 94%
- Nonthermal plasma treatment of polymers modulates biological fouling but can cause material embrittlement 93%
- The effect of bolus properties on muscle activation patterns and TMJ loading during unilateral chewing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Runaway resorption of microcracks contributes to age-related hip-fracture patients 94%
- Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible 94%
- Evaluation of longitudinal time-lapsed in vivo micro-CT for monitoring fracture healing in mouse femur defect models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Collagen fibre-mediated mechanical damage increases calcification of bovine pericardium for use in bioprosthetic heart valves 93%
- The ultrastructure of the starfish skeleton is correlated with mechanical stress 92%
- Micromechanical characterisation of osteoarthritic subchondral bone by micropillar compression 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.