Characterization of CXCL10 as a biomarker of respiratory tract infections detectable by open-source lateral flow immunoassay
Mikkelsen, D.; Aguiar, J. A.; Tremblay, B. J.-M.; Hunjan, M. S.; Eckhard, U.; Gilchrist, J.; Bulir, D.; Smieja, M.; Mubareka, S.; Lambert, C.; Tram, K.; Doxey, A. C.; Hirota, J. A.
Show abstract
Understanding core mechanisms common to respiratory tract viral pathogenesis and host-responses to infections may provide biomarkers for at-risk patient populations that guide interventions aimed at reducing morbidity, mortality, and economic costs. Secreted interferon stimulated gene protein products including CXCL10, CXCL11, and TNFSF10 could provide early biomarker signals that are prognostic for respiratory tract viral infections. In the present study, we had the overarching goal of defining the expression patterns of CXCL10, CXCL11, and TNFSF10 in clinical respiratory mucosal samples for multiple respiratory tract infections including respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 to inform the development of a host-biomarker point of care lateral flow immunoassay tool. Gene expression levels from upper airway samples suggested that CXCL10 and CXCL11 elevations were consistent across multiple viruses, correlated with higher SARS-CoV-2 viral load, and had a lower variance over the course of COVID-19 infection compared to TNFSF10. Deep proteomic profiling using mass-spectrometry revealed CXCL10 protein was not detectable in oral samples from healthy individuals. CXCL10 levels were measured from the saliva of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and showed significant elevations in CXCL10 protein concentration. A prototype lateral flow immunoassay for detecting CXCL10 protein with a sensitivity of 2ng/mL in human saliva is presented. Our work provides a foundation for further exploration of CXCL10 as a host biomarker relevant in respiratory tract viral infections. Leveraging lateral flow immunoassay technology for detection of biomarkers prognostic of respiratory tract infection may provide opportunities to intervene selectively and aggressively in those most at risk of poor outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of the TaqMan™ COVID-19 Pooling Kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic populations at an Institution of Higher Education 94%
- Serological profiles of pan-coronavirus-specific responses in COVID-19 patients using a multiplexed electro-chemiluminescence-based testing platform 94%
- Versatile and flexible microfluidic qPCR test for high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 and cellular response detection in nasopharyngeal swab samples 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Microarray-based detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 proteins, common respiratory viruses and type I interferons 94%
- High throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Respiratory Viral Panel: A Diagnostic and Epidemiologic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viruses. 94%
- Comparative evaluation of rapid isothermal amplification and antigen assays for screening testing of SARS-CoV-2 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multiomics analysis of direct interkingdom dynamics between influenza A virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae uncovers host-independent changes to bacterial virulence fitness 94%
- Type I and III IFNs produced by the nasal epithelia and dimmed inflammation are key features of alpacas resolving MERS-CoV infection 94%
- Type I and III IFNs produced by the nasal epithelia and dimmed inflammation are key features of alpacas resolving MERS-CoV infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards Internationally standardised humoral Immune Correlates of Protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease 94%
- IFI27 transcription is an early predictor for COVID-19 outcomes; a multi-cohort observational study 93%
- Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Up to 15 Months Post-Infection 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.