Innovative 3D method predicts surgery outcomes by calculating Real Contact Surface of renal tumor.
Traverso, P.; Carfi, A.; Bulanti, A.; Fabbi, M.; Giasotto, V.; Mattiauda, M.; Lo Monaco, L.; Tappero, S.; Guano, G.; Balzarini, F.; Borghesi, M.; Mastrogiovanni, F.; Terrone, C.
Show abstract
The Contact Surface Area (CSA) is a predictor for peri-operative parameters and represent the contact area between the tumor and the respective organ. Nowadays, a precise method for calculating CSA is yet to be found in the literature. We tested a new CSA calculation method as a predictor of intra-operative parameters in robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The study population consisted of all consecutive patients treated with RAPN at a single high-volume European institution (between 2020 to 2023; 82 patients). We proposed a new method to measure the real value of CSA using an algorithm that leverages the geometry of kidneys and tumors obtained from 3D reconstruction. These reconstructions were obtained using the certified medical software Materialized Mimics InPrint. Peri-operative parameters of patients were recorded in an anonymous database. We explored the correlation between RCSA, CSA of Hsieh (HCSA), PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores with peri-operative parameters using Spearmans correlation. Furthermore, we examined which of RCSA, PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. score better describes the intra-operative parameters, Warm Ischemia Time (WIT), Operating Time (OT), and Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed. We observed a significant correlation between RCSA and WIT, OT and EBL. Moreover, RCSA outperformed both the PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. score as demonstrated in the ROC curve analysis. In ROC analysis was chosen a threshold for each of the parameters: for WIT 20 minutes, for OT 180 minutes and for EBL 200 mL. At multivariable regression analysis, RCSA emerged as the only independent predictor for WIT, OT and EBL (B=0.39 & p=0.03, B=0.35 & p=0.01, B=0.48 & p<0.001, respectively). Our original and effective 3D RCSA calculation method was favorably associated to intra-operative surgical outcomes. As compared to PADUA and RENAL score, our calculated RCSA represented a better predictor of intra-operative parameters.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 93%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 93%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 95%
- Intraoperative calculus or hemorrhage in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy as a risk factor for recurrent hemospermia 95%
- Reconstruction of the urinary tract at the appropriate time reduces fibrosis of the metanephros in rats as judged by imaging 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 93%
- From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System 92%
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- TissueGrinder, a novel technology for rapid generation of patient-derived single cell suspensions from solid tumors by mechanical tissue dissociation 93%
- Modified Preparation Method of Ideal Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) from Whole Blood 92%
- Automatic detection of pituitary microadenoma from magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning algorithms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.