Back

Detection and Removal of Hyper-synchronous Artifacts in Massively Parallel Spike Recordings

Oberste-Frielinghaus, J.; Morales-Gregorio, A.; Essink, S.; Kleinjohann, A.; Grun, S.; Ito, J.

2024-01-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.01.11.575181 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Contemporary electrophysiology experiments often involve massively parallel recordings of neuronal activity using multi-electrode arrays. While researchers have been aware of artifacts arising from electric cross-talk between channels in setups for such recordings, systematic and quantitative assessment of the effects of those artifacts on the data quality has never been reported. Here we present, based on examination of electrophysiology recordings from multiple laboratories, that multi-electrode recordings of spiking activity commonly contain extremely precise (at the data sampling resolution) spike coincidences far above the chance level. We derive, through modeling of the electric cross-talk, a systematic relation between the amount of such hyper-synchronous events (HSEs) in channel pairs and the correlation between the raw signals of those channels in the multi-unit activity frequency range (500-7500 Hz). We show that whitening the band-pass filtered raw signals removes the above chance HSEs; strongly suggesting they originate from linear mixing of signals. Whitening should therefore be performed prior to spike sorting and any further analysis of precise spike correlation, otherwise analysis results may be considerably affected. Significance StatementArtifacts are ubiquitous in electrophysiological recordings. To mitigate their impact, these artifacts need to be detected and they should be removed from the data without impacting the quality of the data. This work presents measures to identify and quantify the amount of artifacts within a multichannel recording by evaluating the occurrence of hyper-synchronous events i.e., spikes that are synchronous on a sub-millisecond time scale, and further introduces zero-phase component analysis (ZCA) as a method to remove these artifacts from the data. Thus, we recommend to use ZCA as a general preprocessing for electrophysiological recordings.

Published in Journal of Neuroscience · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.