Node centrality in MEG resting-state networks covaries with neurotransmitter receptor and transporter density
Siebenhuehner, F.; Palva, M.; Palva, S.
Show abstract
Neuronal oscillations are central mechanisms in the regulation of neuronal processing and communication (Deco et al., 2011; Fries, 2015; S. Palva & Palva, 2012; Siegel et al., 2012; Singer, 1999), but the relationship between the emergent inter-areal synchronization of oscillations and their underlying synaptic and neuromodulatory mechanisms - the dynome - has remained poorly understood (Kopell et al., 2014). While oscillations are largely generated by fast synaptic neurotransmission among pyramidal cells and interneurons (Traub et al., 2004), these microcircuits are subject to slower neuromodulation in a frequency- and region-specific manner (Batista-Brito et al., 2018; Roopun et al., 2010). While the efferent connections, receptor densities, and neurotransmitter reuptake regulation of neuromodulatory systems are highly heterogeneous across the cortical mantle (Avery & Krichmar, 2017; Deco et al., 2017; Hansen et al., 2022), it has remained unresolved how this variability shapes inter-areal connectivity of neuronal oscillations. Here, we used source-reconstructed human magnetoencephalography (MEG) data to assess how the centrality of brain areas (nodes) in large-scale networks of phase synchrony and amplitude correlations covaries with neurotransmitter receptor and transporter densities. Node centrality strongly covaried with receptor and transporter densities in a coupling- and frequency-specific manner both at the level of individual receptors and transporters and that of principal components. In delta, theta, and gamma frequencies, node centrality in phase-synchronization networks covaried positively, and in high-alpha and beta bands negatively, with dopaminergic, GABA, NMDA, muscarinic, and most serotonergic receptor densities. In amplitude-correlation networks, node centrality in delta and gamma bands covaried positively, and in theta to beta bands negatively, with most receptor and transporter densities. These results establish the contribution of neurotransmitter receptor and transporter densities for shaping connectivity of neuronal oscillations in the human brain and demonstrate a link between coupling of neuronal oscillations with the underlying biological details.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Insula are Hierarchically Organized Traveling Waves 96%
- Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning 96%
- Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic subcortical modulators of human default mode network function 94%
- Spatiotemporal dynamics across visual cortical laminae support a predictive coding framework for interpreting mismatch responses 94%
- Dynamic reconfiguration, fragmentation and integration of whole-brain modular structure across depths of unconsciousness 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brainstem fMRI signaling of surprise across different types of deviant stimuli 93%
- Situating the parietal memory network in the context of multiple parallel distributed networks using high-resolution functional connectivity 93%
- MEG frequency tagging reveals a grid-like code during covert attentional movements 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.