Prolonged time to breast cancer surgery and the risk for metastasis
Hoelzel, D.; Schlesinger-Raab, A.; Schubert-Fritschle, G.; Halfter, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundA growing breast cancer (BC) is associated with an inherent risk of metastasis (MET). If surgical treatment of a BC is delayed, the prognosis worsens continuously with increasing tumor diameter (TD). This frequently overlooked topic in healthcare is currently the subject of debate. MethodsPopulation-based data on BC incidence and surgery waiting period for the U.S. and Germany are used to examine the resulting risks. BC growth and initiation of MET are calculated in a simulation approach using hormone receptor status (HR), tumor volume doubling time (VDT), and TD- dependent survival. ResultsThe U.S. and Germany report 287,850/71,375 BCs annually. Based on an initial mean TD of 19.8mm 15-year mortality in both countries is estimated using a Gompertz function at 19.6% without surgical delay. VDT of HR+ and HR- BCs differs by a factor of 2.4, leading to an estimated mortality increase of 1.34/3.26% (HR+/HR-) if all surgical procedures are pushed back by five weeks. The mean delay in the U.S. and Germany is 33.7/26.0 days respectively. Prolonged waiting periods lead to estimated 4,676/918 additional BC deaths or a 1.6/1.2% rise in BC mortality rate. Further increases are due to MET relapse up to 25 years after diagnosis. ConclusionsA growing tumor can continuously initiate MET with every millimeter. The results of this study offer replicable and valid evidence, based on publicly available clinical and population-based data, that confirmed BCs should be treated according to HR status as soon as possible.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape 94%
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 93%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 93%
- Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the US: a SEER-18 analysis 92%
- SPARC in cancer-associated fibroblasts is an independent poor prognostic factor in non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and exhibits pro-tumor activity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 92%
- ERK3/MAPK6 promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression through collective migration and EMT plasticity 92%
- Inhibition of ADAM17 increases cytotoxic effect of cisplatin in cervical spheroids and organoids 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 93%
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 92%
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival benefit of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 92%
- Survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a SEER-based retrospective cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.