Promoting healthy and sustainable diets through food service interventions in university settings: a scoping review
Kratzer, S.; Theurich, M.; Mareis, T.; Proebstl, S.; Holliday, N.; Yan, S.; Leibinger, A.; Monsef, I.; Bach, L.; Schwingshackl, L.; Simonetti, A.; Hartmann, M.; Lemken, D.; von Philipsborn, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundFood service operations in universities and colleges, such as cafeterias and canteens, may support healthy and sustainable diets among students and staff and contribute to a transformation of the wider food system. Multiple studies on interventions to promote health and sustainability in this setting have been conducted, but no up-to-date, comprehensive review exists. This study aims to fill this gap. MethodsWe used state-of-the-art scoping review methodology. We included any study examining interventions in university or college food service settings aimed at, or potentially suitable for: 1), supporting healthy and/or sustainable diets, 2) reducing food waste, or 3) otherwise increasing the sustainability of the food service operation (e.g. by improving energy efficiency). We considered studies using any study design published in any language without publication date restrictions. We comprehensively searched six academic databases and conducted forward and backward citation searches. We extracted and charted data on key study characteristics, including the reported direction of effects/associations. ResultsWe identified 206 studies reporting on 273 interventions. Most studies (71%) used quasi- experimental study designs, were conducted in North America (53%) or Europe (34%), and were implemented in cafeterias or canteens (76%). The most common intervention types were labelling interventions (26%), improved or increased offerings of healthy and/or sustainable food and beverage options (24%), and information and awareness-raising interventions (18%). The most commonly assessed outcomes were implementation-related (e.g. costs, feasibility, acceptability), diet-related (e.g. sales or consumption of specific foods), and sustainability-related (e.g. carbon footprint). Most, but not all, studies reported mostly effects in the desired direction (e.g. increased vegetable consumption, or decreased food waste). DiscussionMultiple approaches for promoting health and sustainability in university and college food service settings exist. The findings of this review suggest that such interventions can be effective, feasible, cost-effective, and aligned with customer and stakeholder expectations. We therefore suggest that they are considered for implementation more widely. Implementation should be accompanied by monitoring and methodologically robust evaluations to allow for evidence-informed tailoring and adjustments and to improve the existing evidence base.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Content quality versus sharing practices on social media: A cross-sectional analysis of nutrition information on Twitter 94%
- Knowledge and beliefs about dietary inorganic nitrate in a representative sample of adults from the United Kingdom 93%
- A novel web-based 24-hour dietary recall tool in line with the Nova food processing classification: description and evaluation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 94%
- Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers 94%
- Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Charitable Feeding System helps Food Insecure Participants maintain Fruit and Vegetable intake during COVID-19 94%
- Possible roles of phytochemicals with bioactive properties in the prevention of and recovery from COVID-19 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diet behaviour among UK adults: a longitudinal analysis of the HEBECO study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported decreases in the purchases of selected unhealthy foods resulting from the implementation of warning labels in Mexican youth and adult population 94%
- Calorie reformulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of manipulating food energy density on daily energy intake and body weight 94%
- The impact of deprivation and neighbourhood food environments on home food environments, parental feeding practices, and child eating behaviours, food preferences and BMI: The Family Food Experience Study-London 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of food fortification for reducing global malnutrition: a systematic review of economic evaluations across 63 countries 95%
- Assessing sustainable and healthy diets in large-scale surveys: validity and applicability of a dietary index based on a brief food group propensity questionnaire representing the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet 94%
- Development and Validation of a Nutrient Profiling Model for Shopping Baskets: The Grocery Basket Score (GBS) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.