The inevitability and superfluousness of cell types in spatial cognition
Luo, X.; Mok, R. M.; Love, B. C.
Show abstract
Discoveries of functional cell types, exemplified by the cataloging of spatial cells in the hippocampal formation, are heralded as scientific breakthroughs. We question whether the identification of cell types based on human intuitions has scientific merit and suggest that "spatial cells" may arise in non-spatial computations of sufficient complexity. We show that deep neural networks (DNNs) for object recognition, which lack spatial grounding, contain numerous units resembling place, border, and head-direction cells. Strikingly, even untrained DNNs with randomized weights contained such units and support decoding of spatial information. Moreover, when these "spatial" units are excluded, spatial information can be decoded from the remaining DNN units, which highlights the superfluousness of cell types to spatial cognition. Now that large-scale simulations are feasible, the complexity of the brain should be respected and intuitive notions of cell type, which can be misleading and arise in any complex network, should be relegated to history.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gain, not concomitant changes in spatial receptive field properties, improves task performance in a neural network attention model 96%
- Hippocampal replay of experience at real-world speeds 96%
- Unsupervised changes in core object recognition behavior are predicted by unsupervised neural plasticity in inferior temporal cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.