Feedforward circuits enable modality-specific control of cortical inhibition during behavioral state transitions.
Rebola, N.; Zerlaut, Y.; De Brito Van Velze, M.; Dhanasobhon, D.; Martinez, M.; Morabito, A.; Martins Pinho, C.; Berthaux, E.
Show abstract
Local inhibitory neurons (INs), specifically those involved in disinhibitory circuits like somatostatin (SST) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-positive INs, are essential for regulating cortical function during behavior. However, it is unclear the mechanisms by which these INs are recruited during active states and whether their activity is consistent across different sensory cortices. We now reveal that in mice, locomotor activity strongly recruits SST-INs in primary somatosensory (S1) but not visual (V1) cortex. This diverse engagement of SST-INs could not be explained by differences in VIP-IN function but was absent in the presence of visual sensory drive suggesting involvement of feedforward sensory pathways. In agreement, inactivating the somatosensory thalamus, but not decreasing VIP-INs activity, significantly reduces the recruitment of SST-INs in S1 by locomotion. Finally, model simulations suggest differences in SST-INs activity can be explained by varying ratios of VIP-driven inhibition and thalamus-driven cortical excitation. Our work suggests that by integrating feedforward activity with neuromodulation, SST-INs play a central role in adapting sensory processing to behavioral states.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual Thalamocortical Mechanisms of Waking State Dependent Activity and Alpha Oscillations 97%
- Opposing influence of top-down and bottom-up input on different types of excitatory layer 2/3 neurons in mouse visual cortex 96%
- Head Movements Control the Activity of Primary Visual Cortex in a Luminance Dependent Manner 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.